The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 724 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Hepburn
It sounds to me as though this is part of the equation. You have taken the person to hospital, presumably because you think that that is the environment in which they will be safest and is the appropriate place to go to. I understand that an officer is accountable to, and will take their orders from, the superior officer—the supervisors, as you described.
However, I am thinking about what happens if a qualified clinician says, “You’ve brought the person here; it’s now safe.” How do we get to a place whereby officers, including supervisors—it sounds like they might be the key players here, from what you have said—are confident enough to say that they, or the officers on the ground, have been told by an appropriately qualified medical professional, “You can go now—you’ve brought them to the right place”? I can understand that the human instinct, in any profession, is to say, “I’ve got to cover my back here”. What needs to be done to get to that place? It sounds as though you are saying that some of the issues are at the operational end of Police Scotland.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I want to pick up on an area that I explored with the other witnesses, which you have touched on already. It is the bottleneck whereby officers will take someone into a hospital environment—more often than not, A and E—and then feel that they have to wait there with them for a long period of time. David Threadgold talked about the issue sometimes coming down to a superior officer not enabling officers on the ground to leave. You touched on that, ACC Paton—by the way, is your name pronounced Pay-ton or Pah-ton?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Hepburn
That is what I thought. You said that officers and staff should have the confidence and be empowered to leave a person in a hospital or a place in which they are comfortable. We heard directly from Dr Steel—I do not know how frequent an occurrence this is—that there are circumstances in which a qualified clinician will literally say to officers, “You can go now. You have brought this person to this place, and it’s safe to leave.” Yet, for some reason, they will not do that.
If officers have taken a person to hospital, they presumably think—or, at least, they thought in the first instance—that it is an appropriate place to leave them in the care of someone with professional expertise. That begets the question, at what stage should the officer think, “Well, that’s enough for me. I feel confident, now, that this person who understands mental health challenges better than I do is saying that I can go”? Why does the officer not leave at that point? Why are they not thinking, “This is the juncture at which I can leave”?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Hepburn
That speaks to human instinct. I think that it is an understandable human instinct. However, we are hearing about challenges that mean that officers are not able to be diverted to other forms of activity that we would expect them to be doing. I suppose the question is how we get them to move beyond what would be an understandable human instinct—I know that it is hard—and say, “Right. I’ve got a job to do, so I now need to trust this person who has told me I can leave,” so they can then do so.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I suppose that we have to be a little cautious when we are talking about removing offences, which is what we are literally doing in this process. People out there might suddenly think that those offences will not exist any more, but, as you say, they will clearly still exist in law and have legal effect. No fixed-penalty notices have been issued, but are we aware of whether people are still being charged under those offences?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Sorry, I mean outwith the fixed-penalty notice scheme.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I understand that—that was the basis of my question. Are we aware whether people are still being charged under those offences?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Hepburn
That would be helpful, as it would give us wider context about the utility of those offences in general.
I will pick up on Pauline McNeill’s point and the point that Robert made about officials continually keeping these things under review, as we would expect. I would like to understand a wee bit more about the work that is being taken forward in that regard. I presume that the process of adding or removing offences for which fixed-penalty notices could be issued is as straightforward as the process that we are going through right now—it would just be another affirmative instrument.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Okay. Please carry on.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Okay. That is helpful.