The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 724 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Do you not record that?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
It is interesting that you do not record it that way. I wonder if it does not give quite the full picture of the pressure.
The reason that I ask about that is that I notice that, in just the first six months of this year, you had a 49 per cent increase in applications for complaint handling reviews, which is significant. I am trying to get a sense of what is driving that. Is something going badly wrong in policing, which we would want to know about, or is there a lower threshold among people who might make a request for a review? We would know that only if that information was recorded—that would enable us to better understand the situation.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Sorry, what number was it that you said?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I would have—
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
The whole area of collaboration will be for our successor committee to determine, but it should be an area of interest to it.
I have one final straightforward question that I have asked everyone, and you might or might not have the answer to it. It is about the impact of increased employer national insurance contributions. Could I get a reminder of what the impact of that was this year—not so much the proportion that was allocated to mitigate it but the overall cost—and whether there has been an assessment yet of what the cost is likely to be for this coming financial year?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I have a question that relates to annex A of the helpful letter that you sent to us, which gives a breakdown by year of the number of people who receive short-term sentences. It sounds self-evident to say that the challenge that we face here is that people keep getting sent to prison, which drives up the prison population. However, the Parliament legislated for a presumption against short-term sentences. I recognise that we cannot cut across the judge’s right to make a determination in considering any particular case, but the information that you have given us shows that, for the past two years, there has been an increase across all three groups: sentences of up to three months; sentences of three months to six months; and sentences of six months to a year. Do you have any sense of why that might be the case? As I said, we cannot second-guess the determinations that are made by the courts, but do we know why that is happening?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Good afternoon. I have a few questions. You have referred multiple times to the process of categorising the cases. You described the A-plus cases as being the most serious, and, although you did not describe the C categories as less serious, I suppose that that is implied. I appreciate that you will not be able to give a comprehensive answer, but can you give us a sense of what that means in practical terms? What constitutes an A-plus case in comparison with a category C case?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
That would be useful.
On the complaints that you receive more widely—again, you might not be able to give this information now, so it might be something that you have to follow up—what proportion of complaints that you receive are upheld and what proportion are found to be vexatious? Can that be broken down by the categories that you have devised?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I get that. Can it be looked at across the categories that you have devised?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Jamie Hepburn
However, it will level off once that backlog is gone.