The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 620 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Sorry—that is what I meant. I have no doubt that you have spoken with the Crown Office—I would be surprised if you had not—but I meant that you did not ask about this specific issue. That is useful to understand.
This is my final question on part 3, convener, which is on an area that I think is important. Concerns have been raised about victims possibly being asked the same questions multiple times by multiple organisations, which could lead to some form of retraumatisation, and about the approach in the bill not being trauma informed. Have you considered that? Is it a concern for you? It would be a concern for me. Are you concerned that such an approach could retraumatise victims?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
It is quite a significant variance.
Similarly, on part 2 of the bill, COSLA provided the Finance and Public Administration Committee with data from a local authority, which suggested that the Caledonian programme’s
“cost per person amounts to approximately £3,460”
whereas the cost per person outlined in your financial memorandum is £2,325. Again, that is a significant difference, is it not?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
So, you would be willing to make changes to the bill to make this bill UNCRC compliant but, right now, you think that it is.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
So, Police Scotland, which has responsibility for investigating crime, and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, which has responsibility for taking forward prosecutions in criminal cases, are wrong in saying that there is no evidence base for a domestic abuse register.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
The committee was told that it would require systems upgrades for the Crown Office and local government. We did not quite get into the detail of adding tabs and so on, but what I took from them was that it would not be a straightforward process and would be resource intensive. Have you come up with any assessments of what the cost might be? I do not think that you went into too much detail on that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
You clearly had a detailed conversation with Police Scotland. What did the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities and the Crown Office say when you spoke to them about the issue?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I have a couple of questions to raise on part 3. There may be more specific points in the financial memorandum that Sharon Dowey may want to pick up on, but some concerns were expressed by organisations involved in data collection and reporting around the type of support and resources that would be required for them to be able to do that work. To be fair, you covered some of that in relation to charitable organisations, where there might be a more voluntary approach, but I understand from the bill that there would be a requirement on statutory agencies. What is your response to those resourcing concerns?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
She was representing Scottish Women’s Aid, so we must take it at face value that she was speaking on behalf of Scottish Women’s Aid.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I am not necessarily saying that. I am talking specifically about Scottish Women’s Aid. I am simply making the point that we must presume that Marsha Scott was speaking on behalf of Scottish Women’s Aid. Do you not recognise the concerns that she laid out about the bureaucratic burden that the bill would place on organisations? Do you not think that we should take those concerns seriously?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I am not talking about costs. I have a question about costs that I will come to in a minute. I am talking about the bureaucratic burden of administration on organisations and the work that would be involved for them.