The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 376 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Is that your way of saying that I have to be quicker?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Sitting here as a Government minister, it is very difficult to answer whether a committee exercises enough discipline when holding the Government to account. I have never thought of Ms Mackay as a shark, as you suggested she might be, convener, but answering that would put me in a rather invidious position.
As a Government, we could not set out a perspective on that question. Privately, we might have a candid perspective, but, as a Government, we do not have an overt collective perspective.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
The question is hypothetical. If that were to happen, perhaps it would aid things in the way that you describe, but, given how things work just now—with conveners of the Parliament’s committees being elected by committees, once members have been appointed, and with places being allocated party by party—I do not see anything in the manner in which the Government interacts with them that would fundamentally change as a consequence of conveners being elected by means of a vote of Parliament.
11:00Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I do not think that it would change the manner in which we interact with committees except in what the committees might require of us. I do not think that their size would change the dynamic or the nature of the relationship between the Government, as the executive branch, and Parliament, as the legislative branch. I do not think that the size of committees particularly drives that. I say that while sitting here now, but, if the committees were made smaller, maybe we would find, through practical experience, that it changed the dynamic. However, I cannot think of any reason why it would change the relationship between the Government and the committees of Parliament.
It is similar to the earlier question about whether having elected conveners would change that relationship. My answer to that was that I cannot see any reason why it would, and, again, I cannot see any reason why the size of committees would alter that relationship.
There is evidence to assess that right now in so far as we have committees of various sizes. This committee is fairly small but perfectly formed, I should probably say, convener—although that could get me into trouble with the larger committees, so I withdraw that remark. The education committee is much bigger, and I am not aware of anything that, in and of itself, drives a different interaction because one of the two committees is larger than the other. Interaction is driven by the demands of the individual committees.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
The Government does not have a majority in Parliament.
Although that brings pressure to bear on back-bench members of the Government party—which we should recognise, although it is inescapable—the important thing is that, after there is a parliamentary election, committee membership should broadly reflect the composition of Parliament. That is my perspective on the matter.
It could be argued that having smaller committees would be more challenging, because not every party could be represented, but, by its nature, that is down to the size of the parties. We try to reflect parties’ allocation in Parliament across all the committees, and it would be for Parliament to determine whether that should change.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
That could be an option—it has happened before—although I observe that we have only so many members to comprise committees. Therefore, although one might think that that would reduce the pressure on a committee, it might not reduce the pressure on the individuals who comprise the committees.
Yes, I absolutely recognise that some committees will be more legislation intensive, but that is not new in the current parliamentary session—it has always been the case.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I do, if you will let me find them.
The number of Scottish statutory instruments in the first year of our first parliamentary session, from 2000 to 2001, was 326. The number peaked in 2006-07, at 522. The last year for which we have figures is 2023-24, when there were 193 SSIs. Again, I therefore respectfully suggest that we are not overburdening committees with legislation in either its primary or its secondary form.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
By the rural committee—I beg your pardon.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
Well, there is that perspective as well.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jamie Hepburn
I guess that it would depend on the question. If we had introduced legislation, there would be a wider expectation that Parliament had to consider it. Once it is at committee, it is for the committee to determine.
I go back to the figures—I will not read them all out again, because I see the time, convener—