The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 724 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Returning to UNCRC compliance, I did not, to be frank, think that this would be raised as an issue in evidence, but the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Office flagged it almost as an aside.
Indeed, I was struck by what was said when I asked about the matter in our evidence session with the COPFS and the Law Society of Scotland. You have said that you are clear that the bill has no UNCRC compliance issues, but I will quote from the Official Report of a previous meeting. When I asked Dr Forbes from the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service whether she had
“the sense that not enough thought has been given to the issue of compliance with the UNCRC at this stage”,
she replied:
“I did not see it addressed in the policy memorandum, I have to say.”
When I further asked Dr Forbes whether she felt that not enough due consideration had been given to the issue and whether there was
“a possibility that the bill as drafted might fall foul of our legislation with regard to compliance with the UNCRC”. —[Official Report, Criminal Justice Committee, 10 December 2025; c 23.],
she gave a preamble but, effectively, her answer to the question was yes. Why is the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service wrong and you are right?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
I do not think that Scottish Women’s Aid was necessarily saying that it would apply to their organisation specifically. It was talking about the burden that the bureaucracy would place on Police Scotland, and so on.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Well, let us suppose that you were. Where should it come from?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Okay.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
Sorry—that is what I meant. I have no doubt that you have spoken with the Crown Office—I would be surprised if you had not—but I meant that you did not ask about this specific issue. That is useful to understand.
This is my final question on part 3, convener, which is on an area that I think is important. Concerns have been raised about victims possibly being asked the same questions multiple times by multiple organisations, which could lead to some form of retraumatisation, and about the approach in the bill not being trauma informed. Have you considered that? Is it a concern for you? It would be a concern for me. Are you concerned that such an approach could retraumatise victims?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
It is quite a significant variance.
Similarly, on part 2 of the bill, COSLA provided the Finance and Public Administration Committee with data from a local authority, which suggested that the Caledonian programme’s
“cost per person amounts to approximately £3,460”
whereas the cost per person outlined in your financial memorandum is £2,325. Again, that is a significant difference, is it not?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
So, you would be willing to make changes to the bill to make this bill UNCRC compliant but, right now, you think that it is.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
So, Police Scotland, which has responsibility for investigating crime, and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service, which has responsibility for taking forward prosecutions in criminal cases, are wrong in saying that there is no evidence base for a domestic abuse register.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
The committee was told that it would require systems upgrades for the Crown Office and local government. We did not quite get into the detail of adding tabs and so on, but what I took from them was that it would not be a straightforward process and would be resource intensive. Have you come up with any assessments of what the cost might be? I do not think that you went into too much detail on that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Jamie Hepburn
You clearly had a detailed conversation with Police Scotland. What did the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities and the Crown Office say when you spoke to them about the issue?