The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2978 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Colin Beattie
Case 1 certainly involved the SPPA, because we got a response from it and, as I said, that issue was resolved. The second case referred to the SPPA, but I do not have the full letter in front of me—just a few brief highlights. The constituent certainly believes that the SPPA is involved. That will come out in the response, which I have not received yet.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Colin Beattie
So the SPPA received the full amount.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Colin Beattie
Your report says that the SPPA wrote to the Pensions Regulator in October 2025 to advise it of further delays and that, at the time of the audit, the regulator
“had not provided a view on the SPPA’s actions or deadline extensions.”
Do you know whether it has now provided a view? If not, is there an expected timescale?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Colin Beattie
I am pleased to hear that. I understand that, from the beginning, the concept was that there would not necessarily be additional funds going into the IJBs—rather, there would be a movement of funds from secondary to primary care. That was a sticking point, of course, because nobody wants to lose any part of their budget, and it never really happened.
You have described a situation where it has happened, but it is certainly not happening in general. How are you going to stimulate progress on that and push people to actually deliver what was originally intended? It seems almost a moot point after 20 years.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Colin Beattie
You touched on leadership, which is obviously mentioned in the Auditor General’s report. There are concerns about the quality of leadership and the governance and accountability. Those themes come forward again and again, but we do not seem to see any movement on them—certainly nothing that would give us confidence. How are you going to strengthen leadership, both nationally and locally, as well as the important areas of governance and accountability?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Colin Beattie
The report states:
“In correspondence with TPR, the SPPA acknowledged that the previous extended dates were ‘ambitious’.”
Did the SPPA explain why those ambitious dates had been set?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Colin Beattie
Auditor General, in your opening remarks you briefly touched on the impact on individuals. Although the bulk of your report is about process and so on, it is important to remember that there are people behind this who are suffering because of it.
I have had a few complaints, as you might expect, a couple of which I will highlight. One involves a constituent with cancer who is taking early retirement, for obvious reasons. They needed to adjust their mortgage deal, which could only happen once they received an updated pension projection. They were advised that it would take quite a few months to achieve that, and they were extremely concerned that they were at risk of losing their home. That is hardly a good position to be in when you are suffering from cancer. That case has been resolved.
Another one concerns someone who is retiring after 36 years of service. Since July 2025, they have been waiting for what they refer to as a quote from Capita. They have received no pension payments. They are suffering financial hardship, stress and anxiety. They, too, are fearful that their lack of financial resources might make them homeless because they will not be able to keep up the payments on their house. That case is still outstanding.
There are serious issues behind this matter that are affecting individuals. It is not just about people who already have pensions waiting to see whether they are going to get the option of an adjustment—people are being affected by this every day. I am concerned about whether there is anything in place for them, other than turning to an MSP or whatever, because a lot of people just will not do that.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Colin Beattie
We have talked about money, but what is actually needed? IJBs need sustainable financial security to take forward what they are supposed to be delivering, and clearly that is very patchy. What can be done to ensure that that financial stability—that funding—is in place, so that they can deliver timely discharge services?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Colin Beattie
We have had 20 years—in my case, 15 years—of reassurances from you and your predecessors. Why should we believe that it is going to work this time? You paint a very rosy picture, but the report does not paint quite such a rosy picture. How can we get the reassurance that things are actually happening and we are moving in the correct direction?
10:00
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Colin Beattie
I will move on to the timescales involved. Paragraph 9 of the report states:
“The SPPA did not meet its 1 April 2025 legislative deadline for providing affected members … with Remedy calculations and options”.
Paragraph 10 states:
“Following guidance from TPR, the agency provided ‘breach of law’ reports for the affected cohorts in May and June 2025”.
Will you give us a bit of background as to what a breach of law report is and explain what sort of consequences, if any, it has?