The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2875 contributions
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Colin Beattie
Is it true to say that there is some responsibility for monitoring on the part of UHI?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Colin Beattie
I would like to look at one or two aspects of governance. Some of them have been touched on already but there are points that I want to be sure of, for my own clarification.
This is probably a question for Vicki Nairn and Mike Baxter. My understanding is that all communications on financial matters, budgets and so on are funnelled through UHI. Is that correct?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Colin Beattie
I have one or two questions about the financial support for NHS boards, particularly in relation to the proposed change of support. Paragraph 31 of your report says that
“brokerage had increased sharply in recent years, that it was unsustainable, and that it created an inequity with those boards who were operating within their statutory duty to break even.”
The report mentions three sources of funding that the Scottish Government has replaced brokerage with: sustainability funding; deficit support funding; and financial support funding. It also states that there is a
“lack of clarity and transparency around the introduction”
of those deficit support funding mechanisms. Will you elaborate on why you reached that conclusion?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Colin Beattie
You said that you did not become aware of the lack of a budget for Perth immediately. You first of all received notification from somewhere—probably from Perth, but I do not know—saying that there had been audit delays.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Colin Beattie
So a delay was not unexpected.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Colin Beattie
I also want to bring the question of PFIs and their maturity into the mix. When I read the PFI contract for Edinburgh royal infirmary, I found it quite a thriller. In that contract, and a few others that I have skimmed, there are potential commitments to making capital payments to terminate them. There are different options, some of which are quite complex. Has the Scottish Government factored that in? I think that it would have done so somewhere, but is that evident?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Colin Beattie
You have already stated that you will be looking into the matter to see how the arrangements were applied in reality. We look forward to seeing the results—or, indeed, our successor committee will.
On capital spending, with previous reports, we have considered the difficulties with the backlog in repairs and so on. Your report states that capital investment has been “on a downward trend”, with a 22 per cent decrease since 2021-22. That is quite a big difference, given the huge deficit. Can you clarify some of the reasons, as you understand them, for that fall in capital investment? How do the current levels compare with those before the pandemic? Is that even relevant? We keep referring to “pre-pandemic” as if it were a wonderful era, but we are in a new reality now, so we should perhaps be more cautious in that respect. Do you foresee any patient safety or service delivery issues or risks with the current levels of capital investment?
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Colin Beattie
I want to clarify one basic thing. Your report says:
“The Scottish Government advised NHS boards in December 2024 that there would be no brokerage for NHS boards in 2025/26”,
which implies that brokerage is already in place.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Colin Beattie
At the moment, I am trying to see at what point UHI became aware of the problem in creating a budget for 2023-24 and what was done about it.
Public Audit Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 January 2026
Colin Beattie
I have to confess that, in looking at it, I am not entirely sure how it will work, but they no doubt have something in mind.
You mention in the report that the Scottish Government has said that, in part, the brokerage system has been replaced due to the
“inequity with those boards who were operating within their statutory duty to break even.”
The new system has a deficit support funding component that is not repayable, and it is given to boards that are escalated to the support and intervention framework. Given that boards that perform well will not have access to that element of the funding, does that not risk preserving elements of the inequity from the previous system?