Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 20 February 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2961 contributions

|

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Best Value in policing: Joint Best Value audit of policing in Scotland”

Meeting date: 11 February 2026

Colin Beattie

I always look at voluntary redundancy—while it is, in a way, more humane—from a management point of view. You do not know who is going to apply, and, in the context of workforce planning, it becomes in itself a blunt instrument. You are getting rid of numbers, but what about skills, experience and so on?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Best Value in policing: Joint Best Value audit of policing in Scotland”

Meeting date: 11 February 2026

Colin Beattie

Before that, I have a question on the back of your answer. You have usefully sketched out the background and the situation, but you have not said why workforce planning is so difficult. Why is it so difficult?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Best Value in policing: Joint Best Value audit of policing in Scotland”

Meeting date: 11 February 2026

Colin Beattie

I return to the question of the mismatch. Is Police Scotland conscious of that and working to deal with it? Is it going to be dealt with? If so, when? I cannot see that the measures will work without an alignment.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Best Value in policing: Joint Best Value audit of policing in Scotland”

Meeting date: 11 February 2026

Colin Beattie

But one would think that there would be some knowledge of at least the ballpark figure that you need. Police Scotland’s budget submission, for example, says that it needs 850 additional officers. Surely, even taking a broad approach, you could say that it is going to be between 800 and 850. You have history to build on, and you understand where the future pressure points are and where you will need additional resources. One would not think that it was that difficult to come up with a number.

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Best Value in policing: Joint Best Value audit of policing in Scotland”

Meeting date: 11 February 2026

Colin Beattie

I will go back to something that was touched on a few minutes ago. Paragraph 26 of the report explains that the workforce plan

“is not aligned to MTFP”

and Fiona Mitchell-Knight emphasised that. The report says that

“the current financial and workforce plans do not support meaningful discussions within policing on budgets or with Scottish Government on funding”,

which is something that you have touched on in the past few minutes. Paragraph 26 also says that

“Police Scotland intends to present updated financial implications of the workforce plan to deliver the 2030 Vision in the first quarter of 2026/27.”

There seems to be a disconnect between financial planning and workforce planning. How will the financial implications of the workforce plan help to inform delivery of the 2030 vision when more evidence-based workforce performance reporting will take place later?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Best Value in policing: Joint Best Value audit of policing in Scotland”

Meeting date: 11 February 2026

Colin Beattie

In that overall area, something confuses me. Policing uses an officer establishment number in building up its cost base for the budget process. For 2025-26, that is around 16,500 full-time equivalent officers. There is no evidence to support that as the magic number that is required to deliver effective policing into the future. As part of its pre-budget scrutiny submission to the Scottish Parliament’s Criminal Justice Committee, Police Scotland set out the need for around 850 additional officers and 350 additional police staff over the next two years in order to strengthen community policing in particular, which is obviously a priority, and address emerging tasks, which are not detailed in my papers. How robust is that ask? Is there any evidence to support those numbers as being what we need?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Best Value in policing: Joint Best Value audit of policing in Scotland”

Meeting date: 11 February 2026

Colin Beattie

Okay. I will move on to one last question, which is on something that has been touched on already—it might have been you who mentioned it, Auditor General.

Your report states that policing has highlighted that there is a no compulsory redundancy policy. How is that impacting on the ability of policing to effectively plan and reshape the workforce? You touched on that, but do you think, given the information that you have gathered in the course of your work, that that policy would, if it was varied, be key to making progress with workforce planning?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

“Best Value in policing: Joint Best Value audit of policing in Scotland”

Meeting date: 11 February 2026

Colin Beattie

I have a few questions. I am not sure whether to address them to the Auditor General, so I hope that the witnesses will just pick them up accordingly.

Workforce planning is a real issue. Audit Scotland, HMICS and the external auditor have reported that workforce planning is underdeveloped. Paragraph 25 of the report says:

“To ensure it has the capacity to deliver on its vision for policing, Police Scotland is focused on workforce modernisation”

and there is a brief description of what that means. Why is it proving so difficult for Police Scotland to develop and implement its strategic workforce plan?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”, and “Financial sustainability and taxes”

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Colin Beattie

Given that the survey results show that attitudes have not changed in the past five years—the level of understanding has stayed the same—whatever is being done is not enough to get through to people. Otherwise, after five years, we would see some changes in the percentages. Why are UK taxes easier to understand than devolved taxes?

Public Audit Committee [Draft]

Section 22 Report: “The 2024/25 audit of the Scottish Government Consolidated Accounts”, and “Financial sustainability and taxes”

Meeting date: 4 February 2026

Colin Beattie

I am interested in knowing what is being done to improve tax literacy. The Government has published tax literacy objectives, but what further work is planned? You have talked about putting out a simplified document to improve public understanding and awareness, but how will that differ from what you have done before, and how can you assess its impact?