Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 694 contributions

|

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 9 December 2025

Patrick Harvie

It is inevitable that the closest comparisons that we make on a regulatory issue such as this are with other UK nations, but should we also be looking at the wider, global picture? If we raise standards to a regulatory level that we are happy with here, there will be people who get encouraged to go on holiday and get procedures done unsafely somewhere else. Is there anything that we can or should do under the bill that would address the issues of information, awareness or promoting access to services in other jurisdictions and other countries? Is there anything that we can do in that regard to address safety?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 9 December 2025

Patrick Harvie

I will move on to questions regarding fairness and equality. We have heard, both at our previous meeting and in some of the written evidence, a range of views about equalities impacts as a result of the bill. There are those who make the argument that many of the available services and procedures are being provided by a workforce that is predominantly made up of women who are working independently. Many working-class communities see this area of work as something that is rooted in their community.

On the other side, there is a concern that the equalities impacts will extend to reduced availability and increased cost for these procedures, and that many marginalised groups, or groups affected by equalities issues, will be more at risk if safety standards are not high. Those groups may be targeted more by the industry and may be more likely to access these services.

Can you give us an overview of your attitude to the equalities impacts? It may be that they cut in both directions.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 9 December 2025

Patrick Harvie

Even in that answer, you said, “these things”, but is there a clear definition of which things we are referring to as medical procedures?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 9 December 2025

Patrick Harvie

Good morning. I am curious. I was already thinking about this because of the term “medical aesthetics”, which has come up several times. There has been a discussion about the idea that some procedures have been demedicalised, or that the term “medical” is in contention. I have a basic question. What determines whether a procedure is medical? What defines medical aesthetics as opposed to non-medical procedures that people might have for aesthetic reasons? Is it the qualifications of the person who is conducting the procedures, the setting in which they are conducted, how they are regulated or whether they are done for medical reasons—in other words, to treat a medically diagnosed condition?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 9 December 2025

Patrick Harvie

There is not an objective definition, then. We are using the term, “medical aesthetics”, but is there a clearly accepted definition of what that refers to and what it does not?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 9 December 2025

Patrick Harvie

I appreciate that there are different perspectives. From a policy perspective, I am not sure if I am more confused or less confused, but thank you for the answers.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Independent Review of Creative Scotland

Meeting date: 4 December 2025

Patrick Harvie

In an earlier answer, you mentioned the lack of capital funding. A number of the organisations that we have heard from recognise that addressing the climate emergency will be a significant challenge to many culture organisations. That will include a requirement for capital investment in buildings and facilities, either to decarbonise or to address the impacts of climate change. How do you envisage a capital funding stream working within Creative Scotland? How should its top-level strategic goals be defined? Should the body be given guidance from Government? Should it be entirely independent, as the cultural decisions of Creative Scotland are independent from politics? Alternatively, should that be demand led?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Independent Review of Creative Scotland

Meeting date: 4 December 2025

Patrick Harvie

Thank you.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Independent Review of Creative Scotland

Meeting date: 4 December 2025

Patrick Harvie

I will be very quick. Thank you, convener. My question is about political independence.

The act that created Creative Scotland says:

“The Scottish Ministers may give Creative Scotland directions … as to the exercise of its functions. But the Scottish Ministers may not give directions as far as relating to artistic or cultural judgement.”

I think that political independence in respect of creative and artistic judgment is important. The fact that the phrase “culture war” even exists indicates to us that certain issues are being politicised at the moment in our culture, and I would suggest that most of the attempts at that kind of political interference do not come from the Government. They have been expressed in the Parliament or in the media. Does Creative Scotland need similar protection to the one that it has from political interference on cultural and artistic judgments from the Government? Does it need that protection from the Parliament as well?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]

Independent Review of Creative Scotland

Meeting date: 4 December 2025

Patrick Harvie

Thank you.