The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1176 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2024
Patrick Harvie
I have a question for Ben Addy. We have a written submissions from RIAS. As RIAS was producing evidence for a Scottish Parliament committee and our job is to scrutinise the Scottish Government, most of the content of the last section on the way forward is about what the Government can do to try to support the sector or mitigate some of the damage that has been done. I appreciate that, but I wonder whether there is already an established or emerging view from the wider sector across the UK, including in Scotland, about the changes that the UK Government should pursue with the EU. Is a view emerging about specific changes that you seek to advocate for to improve or—as the UK Government sometimes says—to reset the relationship with Europe and to remove some of the barriers that have been put up?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2024
Patrick Harvie
I imagine that the sector that you represent, Vivienne Mackinnon, has a strong view on whether veterinary agreements, and on whether—this is way beyond my level of expertise—sanitary and phytosanitary measures, which cover everything that affects issues with a food or a biological component, should be a political objective for the UK Government.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 5 December 2024
Patrick Harvie
It is interesting that you use a phrase like “keep our borders safe”, which many politicians often use to mean keeping out people who could make a contribution. Biological threats pay no respect to borders. We need those skills and capacities to tackle those real threats.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Patrick Harvie
The review and the trajectory towards £100 million of additional culture funding offer a huge opportunity to improve much about the culture sector. Instead of dragging the sector into Tory transphobic culture wars, it would be of far more practical benefit to address issues such as fair work in a sector in which casual labour and freelance work are pretty much endemic.
Will the cabinet secretary ensure that fair work principles are addressed specifically in the review’s remit? Will he ensure that the unions that represent casual and freelance workers—creatives and those on the hospitality side of the culture sector—are represented as well?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Patrick Harvie
To ask the Scottish Government how the planned review of Creative Scotland will improve compliance with fair work principles in the culture sector. (S6O-04058)
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Patrick Harvie
On a point of order, Presiding Officer. Further to that point of order, I seek reassurance and clarification that challenging transphobia and transphobic views in this chamber is not regarded as a personal insult to anyone.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Patrick Harvie
The cabinet secretary thanked high-income earners for making the fairer contribution that they do. I am sure that she also wants to thank the Greens for designing Scotland’s more progressive tax system, which has raised that extra £1.7 billion a year. The Greens made the case for that while the SNP was still resisting it.
It was also the Greens who led the way on cheaper public transport, especially with the hugely successful bus pass for young people. Will the Scottish Government back our current call for a £2 fare cap for all bus passengers, to make public transport more affordable for everybody throughout the country?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2024
Patrick Harvie
That is encouraging—thank you.
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2024
Patrick Harvie
I also want to ask about repatriation. The section of our written briefing that deals with that quotes from the Scottish Government:
“Where objects are proven to have been acquired unethically we strongly encourage that museums consider repatriation/rematriation of these objects.”
The phrase
“Where objects are proven to have been acquired unethically”
could mean everything or nothing, it seems to me. I wonder whether any further work needs to be done on defining what that means. Is the context of imperialism enough in itself to evidence unethical acquisition? Is a different, more specific or precise definition required, so that any decision not to consider taking that action can be challenged?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee
Meeting date: 28 November 2024
Patrick Harvie
I will stay away from the issue of finances, because I think we should put those questions to the cabinet secretary when we see the budget next week and find out where this agenda sits within the expectation of a rising budget for culture.
I will talk about the political context. There have already been some comments about this not being a new piece of work, as there has been more than a decade of work building towards the point of having a major programme such as this. The political context has changed in that time and we have seen a worrying regrowth and mainstreaming of far-right ideas, with people being apologists for imperialism and worse. Have you detected a growing backlash against the agenda that you are trying to pursue? Is there reluctance or resistance within the sector, hostility from the media and social media or even public reaction to interpretations of existing collections?