Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 11 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1176 contributions

|

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 5 December 2024

Patrick Harvie

I have a question for Ben Addy. We have a written submissions from RIAS. As RIAS was producing evidence for a Scottish Parliament committee and our job is to scrutinise the Scottish Government, most of the content of the last section on the way forward is about what the Government can do to try to support the sector or mitigate some of the damage that has been done. I appreciate that, but I wonder whether there is already an established or emerging view from the wider sector across the UK, including in Scotland, about the changes that the UK Government should pursue with the EU. Is a view emerging about specific changes that you seek to advocate for to improve or—as the UK Government sometimes says—to reset the relationship with Europe and to remove some of the barriers that have been put up?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 5 December 2024

Patrick Harvie

I imagine that the sector that you represent, Vivienne Mackinnon, has a strong view on whether veterinary agreements, and on whether—this is way beyond my level of expertise—sanitary and phytosanitary measures, which cover everything that affects issues with a food or a biological component, should be a political objective for the UK Government.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Review of the EU-UK Trade and Co-operation Agreement

Meeting date: 5 December 2024

Patrick Harvie

It is interesting that you use a phrase like “keep our borders safe”, which many politicians often use to mean keeping out people who could make a contribution. Biological threats pay no respect to borders. We need those skills and capacities to tackle those real threats.

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Patrick Harvie

The review and the trajectory towards £100 million of additional culture funding offer a huge opportunity to improve much about the culture sector. Instead of dragging the sector into Tory transphobic culture wars, it would be of far more practical benefit to address issues such as fair work in a sector in which casual labour and freelance work are pretty much endemic.

Will the cabinet secretary ensure that fair work principles are addressed specifically in the review’s remit? Will he ensure that the unions that represent casual and freelance workers—creatives and those on the hospitality side of the culture sector—are represented as well?

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Patrick Harvie

To ask the Scottish Government how the planned review of Creative Scotland will improve compliance with fair work principles in the culture sector. (S6O-04058)

Meeting of the Parliament

Point of Order

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Patrick Harvie

On a point of order, Presiding Officer. Further to that point of order, I seek reassurance and clarification that challenging transphobia and transphobic views in this chamber is not regarded as a personal insult to anyone.

Meeting of the Parliament

Budget 2025-26

Meeting date: 4 December 2024

Patrick Harvie

The cabinet secretary thanked high-income earners for making the fairer contribution that they do. I am sure that she also wants to thank the Greens for designing Scotland’s more progressive tax system, which has raised that extra £1.7 billion a year. The Greens made the case for that while the SNP was still resisting it.

It was also the Greens who led the way on cheaper public transport, especially with the hugely successful bus pass for young people. Will the Scottish Government back our current call for a £2 fare cap for all bus passengers, to make public transport more affordable for everybody throughout the country?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Empire, Slavery and Scotland’s Museums

Meeting date: 28 November 2024

Patrick Harvie

That is encouraging—thank you.

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Empire, Slavery and Scotland’s Museums

Meeting date: 28 November 2024

Patrick Harvie

I also want to ask about repatriation. The section of our written briefing that deals with that quotes from the Scottish Government:

“Where objects are proven to have been acquired unethically we strongly encourage that museums consider repatriation/rematriation of these objects.”

The phrase

“Where objects are proven to have been acquired unethically”

could mean everything or nothing, it seems to me. I wonder whether any further work needs to be done on defining what that means. Is the context of imperialism enough in itself to evidence unethical acquisition? Is a different, more specific or precise definition required, so that any decision not to consider taking that action can be challenged?

Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee

Empire, Slavery and Scotland’s Museums

Meeting date: 28 November 2024

Patrick Harvie

I will stay away from the issue of finances, because I think we should put those questions to the cabinet secretary when we see the budget next week and find out where this agenda sits within the expectation of a rising budget for culture.

I will talk about the political context. There have already been some comments about this not being a new piece of work, as there has been more than a decade of work building towards the point of having a major programme such as this. The political context has changed in that time and we have seen a worrying regrowth and mainstreaming of far-right ideas, with people being apologists for imperialism and worse. Have you detected a growing backlash against the agenda that you are trying to pursue? Is there reluctance or resistance within the sector, hostility from the media and social media or even public reaction to interpretations of existing collections?