The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3397 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
We have to be careful, as that involves an active case. We cannot really discuss it.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
No problem. Thank you very much.
Paul Sweeney has been much concerned with the petition’s progress, and he has been with us online this morning. I will use my discretion to invite him in and see whether he would like to put any questions to you.
Welcome, Mr Sweeney—the floor is yours.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
There we are. Thank you, Mr Sweeney. Your contribution and some of the others that we have heard along the way perhaps play into what I might pose as the final question.
The Scottish Government has committed to updating guidance on how local authorities deal with dangerous listed buildings, including undertaking research to inform that work. Is there any point that you might want to volunteer in conclusion, additional to anything that we have discussed, that you would like to see reflected or included in that fresh guidance?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you all very much for what has been a very interesting conversation. We have had the opportunity to consider the petition on a number of occasions, and it does come to mind sometimes in the period between our considerations. When a building that is under threat materialises in the national infrastructural consciousness, one immediately thinks of the provisions that we have been discussing.
We will consider the evidence that we have heard at a future date, and thank you all for your participation. I suspend the meeting briefly.
10:32 Meeting suspended.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Can we incorporate the suggestions made in the ALACHO dispatch in our submission to the minister? Are we agreed?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Yes, we can, absolutely. That would be a perfectly reasonable response.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Not that that is unique.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Can we reserve that option and seek an expedited response?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
It is a badge of honour of this committee that we do not let ministers off the hook.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
PE1988, which was lodged by Sue Wallis, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to review the process for allowing raw sewage discharge from homes into coastal waters, to provide additional funding to the Scottish Environment Protection Agency for enforcement and to introduce legislation to ban households from discharging raw sewage. We last considered the petition at our meeting on 30 October 2024, when we agreed to write to the Scottish Government. Its response states that water, waste water and drainage policy consultation is being used to inform its policy development process throughout 2025.
We asked the Scottish Government about SEPA’s purpose to improve the health and wellbeing of people in Scotland, as set out in the Regulatory Reform (Scotland) Act 2014. The response states that the general purpose provides for a clear hierarchy that acknowledges the three elements of sustainable development, but that primacy is to be given to protecting and improving the environment. The Scottish Government states that it is content that SEPA has sufficient resources to apply its approach to regulation and principles across all its functions, as well as its enforcement policy.
The petitioner’s written submission shares her understanding that SEPA has the powers to prosecute for unrepaired pipes but has not done so because of concern that it will become too expensive to pursue. Under the current approach of contacting home owners about changing outfall pipe systems, she points out that there is no follow-up action to check that the required work has been done. The petitioner calls for a review of how SEPA staff monitor direct outfall pipes for homes in Scotland and believes that the Scottish Government should ask SEPA to explain why there have been no prosecutions arising from raw sewage discharges from broken outfall pipes.
Do any members wish to comment in the light of the Scottish Government’s response and/or the petitioner’s response?