The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3584 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
This issue is familiar to the committee because petitions that address it come to us from time to time. Work is supposedly under way but it is not yet crystallised into a formal date.
Do we have any proposals from the committee about how we might proceed?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
That is the easiest thing for us to consider doing. How old is Callum now?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 13 November 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Are there any other suggestions from committee members?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
I want to fully understand that point. I asked about your conclusion that national parks have failed to make a positive contribution. Does that mean that the Cairngorms national park has made a neutral contribution, or has it created a negative environment for farming and crofting?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Good morning, and welcome to the 16th meeting in 2024 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. We are in a different committee room from our normal one this morning because one of our witnesses is joining us online. I am sorry—I have been nodding in the wrong direction to the sound people to tell us to go live, because they are sitting in a different part of the room this morning.
Our colleague Fergus Ewing is unfortunately not to able join the committee this morning. We have apologies from him, and we do not have a substitute from the Scottish National Party or from Fergus for this morning’s business.
Our first agenda item is to agree whether to take agenda items 4 and 5 in private. Agenda item 4 is consideration of the evidence that we will hear this morning, and agenda item 5 is consideration of the draft report on our inquiry into the A9. Are colleagues content to take those items in private?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Is it still morning? No, it is afternoon by six tenths of a second, as it turns out.
We last considered the petition at our meeting on 24 January 2024, when we agreed to write to Police Scotland. We have received a response from Police Scotland that states that it
“requires no evidence or certification as proof of biological sex or gender identity other than a person’s self-declaration, unless it is pertinent to any investigation with which they are linked as a victim, witness or accused and it is evidentially critical that we legally require this proof ”.
We also received a submission from the petitioners, reflecting on all the responses that we have received from Police Scotland during consideration of the petition. Their submission also highlights the media coverage generated by Police Scotland’s most recent response and the subsequent comments that have been made by the chief constable and deputy chief constable, including in correspondence with the Criminal Justice Committee.
Our colleague Michelle Thompson, who is unable to join us today, has provided a written submission in support of the petition that shares her view on the lack of clarity being offered by Police Scotland on the operational detail of its policies.
Before I invite the committee to consider how we might proceed, I wonder whether Tess White would like to contribute to our deliberations.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
In an unexpected further burst of interventionist action, Mr Torrance has come forward with a proposal that we keep the petition open and try to track down a bit more detail. Are colleagues content that we do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
I need to move along and bring colleagues in, but there is something that I am interested in. I will put to you a similar question to the one that I asked of the previous panel. What impact have national parks had on people living in them and on the economy on which they depend?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Mr Lucas, do you wish to add to that?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 30 October 2024
Jackson Carlaw
So we would be seeking some factual responses.
I see that a member of the public would like to speak. I welcome them but, unfortunately, we are not able to take contributions from the public gallery.
Mr Rowley, would you like to add anything to what we have said about actions that we will take?