The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4175 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. Are we agreed?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I am happy with that. Are colleagues content to proceed on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I think that the evidence that we received talked about an expectation that the Scottish Government would conduct such a review. As much as anything, we need to establish that such a review is in prospect.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
That will give us further information, and we will consider the petition again in due course. Thank you, Mr Marra, for joining us for your first appearance at the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
We are agreed. We can all see the substance of the issue at hand, but I am struck by the Scottish Government’s suggestion that local authorities look at innovative ways to reduce allotment waiting lists. I am struggling to think of what an innovative way of dealing with an allotment waiting list would be but, notwithstanding my puzzlement with that concept, I am afraid that I am reluctantly of the same view.
The very clear advice from the Scottish Government is that the matter is for local authorities to deal with and, as SPICe points out, the petition seeks to give an entitlement to several hundreds of thousands of people, which is impractical.
I think that we are agreed that although we understand the substance of the issue, we will close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders. Is that the view of the committee?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
From what you have both said, it sounds as though there was a driving necessity to bring about a change in the arrangements that were in place. Every bit as much as clinicians and others thought that it was the right way forward, it sounds as though the previous arrangements were potentially dangerously unstable in terms of being able to provide a service.
On that basis, I am interested to know whether, to your knowledge, in the interim since 2016, the practice that you have evolved has been rolled out to other parts of the United Kingdom outside Scotland. In so far as you were able to establish a service, will you tell us what the main challenges were in trying to bring about what you have achieved, as a general introduction to the questions that will then follow? I do not know who will volunteer to speak.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
That is very helpful. Thank you.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I want to go back over some of that territory. You have spoken about the fact that it is felt that it is a “non-starter” to consider retraining pathologists and that the desire for that does not exist among that community. You have alluded to the shortage of radiologists. To be perfectly candid, it is not a public secret that Scotland is acutely short of radiologists. For example, the 62-day cancer standard is not being met by any of Scotland’s health boards. The waiting time for all the key diagnostic tests, including radiology, is not being met anywhere in Scotland. The statistics from December 2022 show that just 45.8 per cent of patients waited less than six weeks for their diagnostic test.
This is not necessarily a question that you can answer, but I wonder whether similar pressures were advanced in the arguments that took place when your service was set up. The Government might say in response to the petition, or to any initiative that we might subsequently seek to promote, that faced with an acute shortage of radiologists, its first priority should be the living and that any such proposal would divert and potentially further undermine our ability to satisfy or meet currents needs, or even to close the gap, as regards current provision. Was a similar sentiment advanced when you set up your service?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
We do, in fact. I was getting ahead of myself by saying that I would bring in my colleague Alexander Stewart, because my colleague Fergus Ewing, who spoke a moment ago, has some questions directly on the finance side.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 May 2023
Jackson Carlaw
That is very helpful. Thank you very much. I bring in my colleague Alexander Stewart, who will ask some questions about tissue samples.