Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 9 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3582 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 21 December 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Minister—

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 21 December 2022

Jackson Carlaw

I did not repeat the question. You indicated that the licence was an adequate method of control, but it clearly is not.

The petitioner made the point that, if everybody with a bird of prey—a falcon—let it loose every day during the open season, and every day it took a hare, it would take 50 years for those birds of prey to take as many hares as are shot in one year. Are birds of prey seriously a threat to conservation of the mountain hare?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 21 December 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Yes, but you commented a moment ago that the birds could legitimately hunt other prey, just not mountain hare. Is the eagle supposed to have some sort of education about which of the animals on the ground it is allowed to hunt?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 21 December 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Okay. If it is 1 per cent, that is 1,000, perhaps, taken by birds of prey each year, and 26,000 to 38,000—at the absolute maximum, 50,000—are shot each year. Is the legislation proportionate in terms of the impact that it has had on those who fly birds of prey?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 21 December 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Is that for birds of prey or shooting?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 21 December 2022

Jackson Carlaw

It is a reflection of the fact that the birds have not flown for two years.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 21 December 2022

Jackson Carlaw

Are members content with that suggestion?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 21 December 2022

Jackson Carlaw

We invite the petitioner to take note of the initiatives that the Scottish Government has said that it will progress. It is obviously open to the petitioner to return if he feels that that does not deliver as is hoped. We thank the petitioner very much for his petition.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 21 December 2022

Jackson Carlaw

That is noted.

Does the committee agree to close the petition and to take that action?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 21 December 2022

Jackson Carlaw

PE1966, which was lodged by Helen Ferguson on behalf of the Scottish Gamekeepers Association, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to formally recognise local knowledge and ensure that it is given full consideration alongside scientific knowledge throughout consultation and decision-making processes and in policy development, specifically in the conservation arena.

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization defines local knowledge as

“the understandings, skills and philosophies developed by societies with long histories of interaction with their natural surroundings. For rural and indigenous peoples, local knowledge informs decision-making about fundamental aspects of day-to-day life.”

Helen Ferguson has argued that local knowledge is often considered inferior to scientific knowledge and that the conservation arena is dominated by academia and the scientific elite, which is distanced from the practical daily routine and reality of rural practitioners.

Helen also suggests that the board and leadership of NatureScot have little representation from individuals who have experience of day-to-day land or water management. She also raises concerns about accessibility issues in relation to poor broadband connection in rural areas, leading to challenges when engagement is something that they would wish to pursue.

The Scottish Government’s response to the petition sets out its co-design approach to developing a new Scottish biodiversity strategy, its delivery plan and its work on consulting the public on proposed legislation.

Do members have any comments or suggestions?

10:45