The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3582 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Minister—
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
I did not repeat the question. You indicated that the licence was an adequate method of control, but it clearly is not.
The petitioner made the point that, if everybody with a bird of prey—a falcon—let it loose every day during the open season, and every day it took a hare, it would take 50 years for those birds of prey to take as many hares as are shot in one year. Are birds of prey seriously a threat to conservation of the mountain hare?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Yes, but you commented a moment ago that the birds could legitimately hunt other prey, just not mountain hare. Is the eagle supposed to have some sort of education about which of the animals on the ground it is allowed to hunt?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Okay. If it is 1 per cent, that is 1,000, perhaps, taken by birds of prey each year, and 26,000 to 38,000—at the absolute maximum, 50,000—are shot each year. Is the legislation proportionate in terms of the impact that it has had on those who fly birds of prey?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Is that for birds of prey or shooting?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
It is a reflection of the fact that the birds have not flown for two years.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
Are members content with that suggestion?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
We invite the petitioner to take note of the initiatives that the Scottish Government has said that it will progress. It is obviously open to the petitioner to return if he feels that that does not deliver as is hoped. We thank the petitioner very much for his petition.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
That is noted.
Does the committee agree to close the petition and to take that action?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2022
Jackson Carlaw
PE1966, which was lodged by Helen Ferguson on behalf of the Scottish Gamekeepers Association, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to formally recognise local knowledge and ensure that it is given full consideration alongside scientific knowledge throughout consultation and decision-making processes and in policy development, specifically in the conservation arena.
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization defines local knowledge as
“the understandings, skills and philosophies developed by societies with long histories of interaction with their natural surroundings. For rural and indigenous peoples, local knowledge informs decision-making about fundamental aspects of day-to-day life.”
Helen Ferguson has argued that local knowledge is often considered inferior to scientific knowledge and that the conservation arena is dominated by academia and the scientific elite, which is distanced from the practical daily routine and reality of rural practitioners.
Helen also suggests that the board and leadership of NatureScot have little representation from individuals who have experience of day-to-day land or water management. She also raises concerns about accessibility issues in relation to poor broadband connection in rural areas, leading to challenges when engagement is something that they would wish to pursue.
The Scottish Government’s response to the petition sets out its co-design approach to developing a new Scottish biodiversity strategy, its delivery plan and its work on consulting the public on proposed legislation.
Do members have any comments or suggestions?
10:45