The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3582 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I think that we might want to confirm that with NHS Tayside. Do members agree to that?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I think that we are all disappointed, which is why the petition has stayed open. There seems to have been quite a curious bureaucratic process and almost obfuscation, given the opportunity and the benefit that there would clearly be to patients in Scotland. We heard how the alternative has been so disappointing historically.
I think that we want to try to clarify those points. I thank Rhoda Grant, because that has taken forward the committee’s understanding of the current situation.
We will keep the petition open and write to the various organisations, including the Scottish Government, after confirming with NHS Tayside that the application has now been submitted.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Are colleagues on the committee content with the suggestion from Mr Torrance?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
We thank the petitioner very much for their petition and we hope that the action of the Scottish Government now progresses. Of course, as we have said in the past, in the event that the petitioner feels that there has been a shortcoming in the commitment that has been given, they can come back to us with a fresh petition in due course.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
We thank the petitioner for the petition and again say that, in the event that they feel that the actions that have now been promised do not materialise, they can return at a later date. That was the last of our continuing petitions.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. I have to say that it was judged necessary for the protection of families in situations of domestic abuse to introduce regulations as a consequence of the 2020 act, but those are not going to be implemented until 2024. Let me anticipate that we will be told that the pandemic means that work on various things was delayed. However, to be told that it is expected that that might not happen until 2024 all sounds a bit vague and woolly to me.
In addition to Alexander Stewart’s recommendations, I propose that we go back to the Scottish Government to ask why on earth this delay involving an issue of protection—a protection that the Parliament regarded as being so necessary that we embodied it in legislation—is going to take until an unspecified date in 2024 to resolve. There seems to me to be a lack of urgency. The pandemic is now behind us, in the sense that I do not think that it is imposing a burden on the Government such that it cannot pursue the implementation of provisions in its own legislation. I think that the distress that the delay will be causing really ought to be given greater urgency than the response suggests that it has been. Are colleagues content that we proceed on that basis? Does anybody else want to comment?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Colleagues, I am obviously sympathetic to the representations that we have received from Mr Choudhury. Could we couple that suggested action with a notice to the petitioner, drawing their attention to the actions that the Scottish Government has indicated are being taken, but pointing out to them that they can bring back the petition in a year’s time if they feel that the provisions that the Government has said are about to be fulfilled by local authorities and Water Safety Scotland have failed to address the issues? I do not know whether there is much more that we can do at this stage, but we could draw to the petitioner’s attention that there is that route to take.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Yes, that makes sense. We will accommodate all of that. I would quite like us to see a draft—even by correspondence—of the potential letter to the minister. Is that agreed?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I am content with that. In asking the Government to undertake an exploration of the benefits and disadvantages, I might also draw to its attention, or provide it with, the response that we received from the UK Government saying that it would be very happy to engage on the whole matter.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 18 January 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I am content with that. I also suggest that, in the light of the responses that we might receive, we go back and ask SPICe to draw all that information together in the form of a further briefing, which would then inform the committee about the steps that we could take on the back of that. We want to arrive at a solution having underpinned our recommendation by exploring every possible piece of advice to clarify all the outstanding points.