The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3582 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Colleagues, do we agree to the suggestions?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
It is not even that we do not have the legislation. The issue is with implementing it—that is the extraordinary thing. Are we agreed that we will proceed on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Are there any other suggestions, colleagues?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
We could also draw Mr Ewing’s comments to the attention of colleagues in the Scottish Parliament who have raised the issues, to see whether there is anything more that they might be able to offer the committee by way of a testimony or consideration. That would be helpful.
I think that we are all agreed that we will keep the petition open and that there are serious issues underpinning it that need to be properly examined and pursued. We have outlined a number of open workstreams that we will pursue ahead of our next consideration of the petition. Are colleagues content with that?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
That brings us to item 2, which simply involves my asking members to agree to take item 5 in private. Are members content for us so to do?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Good morning, and welcome to the second meeting of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee of 2023. Since last we met, we sadly have lost the services of Paul Sweeney MSP, who has been with the committee since the start of the current session of Parliament. I place on record my thanks to Paul. He was a very proactive member of the committee and I very much enjoyed his insights and sometimes—I suppose he would not mind me saying—out-of-left-field thinking in response to some of the petitions.
I am absolutely delighted to welcome Carol Mochan to the committee in Paul’s place. Carol has been with us before as a substitute, but now joins us as a full member of the committee. Although, in that capacity, she made a declaration of interests, just for completeness’ sake, and for the record, I invite her to do so again this morning.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
That brings us to item 3, which is consideration of continued petitions. We have two continued petitions on which we intend to hear evidence. The first is petition PE1941, on stopping destruction of headstones in community cemeteries, which was lodged by Councillor Andrew Stuart Wood. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to monitor and regulate actions that are taken by local authorities when undertaking their statutory duty of ensuring health and safety within our cemeteries.
We are joined this morning by the petitioner, Councillor Andrew Stuart Wood, and by Desmond Barr from the Friends of Hawkhead Cemetery. Good morning to you both. Thank you for coming to give us evidence on this petition. We are also joined by Paul O’Kane MSP, who will be sharing his comments and reflections once we have heard from our witnesses.
Members have a number of questions that they would like to explore. Is there anything either of you would like to say in advance of members kicking off, or are you happy for us just to move to questions?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Perhaps you can decide who will answer first.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Can I cut in? In part, your concern is that a policy that was established as a consequence of a fatality from a headstone memorial that was some 7 feet tall and of heavy construction has led to regulations being applied now to much smaller and, frankly, less dangerous headstones, and in a highly destructive way without notice. That is causing distress and is causing sometimes irreparable damage to the stones themselves.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you for the photographs that you have given us. One shows a very good example of trenching, with a headstone literally having been halved. In essence, a hole has been dug, the stone has been inserted in that hole and all the details on the stone of the recently deceased person are buried beneath the ground—along with, unfortunately, the deceased—so one no longer has any idea whom the stone is commemorating. It looks quite crass.
10:00