The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3582 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Fraser.
Although, as I said earlier, I am on the A9 occasionally, in an earlier time in my political life the A77 from Eastwood to Ayr was notorious for loss of life. That issue was resolved with the dualling of that section. At one point, I think, more people lost their lives on that road, annually, than on any other in Scotland. Dualling is the ultimate and only reliable way in which we can hope to provide a safe journey and, as Kate Forbes said, achieve other objectives that are also in the national interest.
Thank you all very much. Are my colleagues on the committee content to consider at a subsequent time the evidence that we heard both from the Lord Advocate and in this session?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
And many other things.
Two parliamentary colleagues have joined us: Kate Forbes and Murdo Fraser. O comes before R, so I invite Kate Forbes to address to the committee comments that we can take into account as we consider the petition.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I do not think that we have got to the end of this issue yet—or have we? I am sorry, colleagues, for summing up on behalf of the committee. Do colleagues have any points to make?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
The petitioners have specifically requested that they be given an opportunity to speak to the committee, but it would have to be a prelude to our trying to bottom out with the new minister exactly how matters could be realised instead of our just getting a lot of good will without any outcome being achieved or the desirability or otherwise of the outcome being assessed and responded to.
As a result, I might be minded to keep the petition open and accede to that request from the petitioners, as a precursor to speaking further to the new minister, who I understand has been presented as having vast experience of parliamentary life and an ability to resolve even the most intractable of problems. We will be very happy to put that ambition to the test.
Do members agree to keep the petition open and to accede to the petitioners’ request on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Is a record of that engagement kept?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. The Lord Advocate identified two situations. I think that the committee fully understands that, where there is any suggestion of a suspicious death or a death of unknown cause, different rules must pertain. However, the Lord Advocate also suggested that a post mortem can identify underlying systemic health deficiencies.
Children are excluded from post-mortem scanning—my understanding is that that does not work with young children; their bodies have not developed to the point where that would be appropriate. The professionals in England to whom we spoke told us that 94 per cent of all causes of death are established by use of scanning and that a similar percentage of their post mortems were non-invasive. I know that one of my colleagues will be pursuing that issue later.
You carry out post mortems when you identify that they are essential. The term “essential” seems to me to be very general.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
What percentage of post mortems that are conducted involve the brain being removed?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I understand that, but my understanding is that removing the brain is more a matter of routine in Scotland than it is elsewhere in the United Kingdom. Elsewhere in the UK, it is not routine practice simply to remove the brain in the way that we seem to do here. I wonder whether we have fallen behind medical practice elsewhere in the way in which we are proceeding.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Is that record open to inspection?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 14 June 2023
Jackson Carlaw
If a relative were to assert that they did not feel that there had been any engagement, a record would be publicly available that would demonstrate that, in fact, their assertion was not correct.