Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 27 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 3584 contributions

|

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

New Petitions

Meeting date: 8 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Are members inclined to support the proposal?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 8 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you very much, minister.

We most recently considered the petition on 31 May, when we reflected on the evidence that we had taken in April from the petitioner and from Who Cares? Scotland, CELCIS, the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland and The Promise Scotland. That was a striking round-table session, which persuaded the committee of the fundamental decency and drive of Jasmin’s petition.

I think that you have already answered this question but, to open the discussion, will you provide a clear assertion of where the extending of eligibility for continuing care and aftercare through legislation sits in the Government’s priorities?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 8 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

If Cara Cooper or Sarah Corbett wishes to come in, they should let me know. The minister may also invite them to come in.

I think that I follow what you are saying, minister. Through the listening exercise and the consultation, you are exploring ways in which the priority of extending eligibility for continuing care and aftercare could be realised or delivered. That may or may not be through legislation. Is that where we are at? Do you see there being a role for legislation or do you think that, through the work that you are doing, there might be another route to achieving the outcome?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 8 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Maurice Golden has a question, which I think that I have heard two answers to already, so we will see if he can drill down and get the definitive one.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 8 November 2023

Jackson Carlaw

PE1913, which was lodged by Wendy Swain, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to create a separate department within Social Security Scotland that will fast-track future adult disability payments—ADPs—for people with a cancer diagnosis while they are undergoing treatment.

We last considered the petition on 23 February and agreed to write to Social Security Scotland. The response from the agency reiterates that the Scottish Government provides a person-centred service and does not prioritise a single condition or type of disability above another. The response states that the Scottish Government does not support an additional fast-track procedure specifically for people with cancer and that there is a fast-track process for people with a terminal illness.

In response to questions about processing times, Social Security Scotland said that there are no targets, as no two applications are the same. However, it indicates that the majority of people will receive a decision within four months and that payments are then calculated from the date of the application.

I should have said that the Scottish Government believes that the fast-track process for people with a terminal illness would accommodate a significant number of those people with a cancer diagnosis.

Do colleagues have any suggestions in light of the Scottish Government’s decision not to take action on the aim of the petition?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 October 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Obviously, 2023 is fast disappearing and nothing has materialised yet. Are we content to close the petition?

10:00  

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 October 2023

Jackson Carlaw

We will hear what NHS Tayside has to say, but we will do that on the presumption that, having heard what it has to say, we might very well seek to have the petitioner or others who have been affected by the condition give evidence to the committee, so that we have that on the record, with everyone able to see what the condition has led to and the difficulties that people have had in finding a way forward. Are colleagues content to proceed on that basis?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 October 2023

Jackson Carlaw

Thank you very much. You came, you asked, you got.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 October 2023

Jackson Carlaw

There might come a point when, in order to advance the aims of the petition, we ask the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee to look at where the petition might go. I think that we should keep the petition open; in the first instance, write to the minister, as suggested; see what the response is; and then consider the best way forward in trying to secure the aims of the petition. Do we agree to that approach?

Members indicated agreement.

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 25 October 2023

Jackson Carlaw

I do not think that we have ever held a joint session. The Scottish Parliament has provided its campus for the Scottish Youth Parliament to meet. The policy has been that that happens once in each session of the Scottish Parliament, I think. Are you suggesting that we write to the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body, to ask whether it would—?