The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3584 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
We thank the petitioner, to whom we will write, explaining our reasonings.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Ewing. I hear echoing in my ear my late colleague David McLetchie, who similarly was a conveyancing lawyer of some experience. I recall his views on the legislation on home reports, as introduced in the 2007 Parliament—I remember those debates vividly. I think that there is an interesting potential future petition to be made to this Parliament, following up on the Scottish Government identifying the limitations of the home report. If home reports are under review, it would be very interesting to know how those limitations have been addressed and what the future value of the home report is, because it seems to me to mitigate expense in only a very few cases. People now find that they have to incur the very same expense over and above the fact that a home report has been commissioned. However, I think that we have agreed to close the petition at this stage. Do members agree?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
PE2154, lodged by Jasmine Bissett, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to review and update planning policies to make it mandatory for new urban developments to give consideration to equestrian usage and ensure that suitable access and signage is included as part of that consideration.
The SPICe briefing for the petition explains that, in general, decisions on planning applications must be made in accordance with the development plan. The development plan for the given area in Scotland consists of the fourth national planning framework—NPF4—and the relevant local development plan, with which all colleagues will feel familiar. NPF4 requires planning authorities to consider the need to safeguard access rights when developing LDPs.
However, under the Land Reform (Scotland Act) 2003, local authorities and national park authorities have a legal duty to protect routes for responsible public access to land in the countryside, and the Scottish outdoor access code stipulates that access rights extend to horse riding. In its response to the petition, the Scottish Government states that it expects the issue of
“horse-related infrastructure in urban developments”—
what a sentence—to be considered at a local level, including in terms of signage, to ensure suitability to location and use.
In an additional submission, the petitioner expresses the view that local authorities tend to prioritise more popular modes of transport to the detriment of the needs of equestrians. Additionally, the petitioner highlights that the response received from the Scottish Government acknowledged that Scotland’s great trails were designed solely for pedestrian usage and that catch-up has been needed to open suitable areas of the trails for other uses.
I have equestrian users in my constituency, so I am aware that sometimes there is a lack of access or thought given to routes for equestrian users. Notwithstanding that, and in the light of the Scottish Government’s response, do members have any suggestions as to how we might proceed?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
We thank the petitioner.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you for that suggestion. I am slightly concerned that the bill was in the Government’s programme for government in September but then disappeared in the updated legislative programme.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
That draws to a conclusion the public part of our meeting. As I said at the start of our meeting, we have an additional committee meeting next Wednesday, 25 June, when we will take evidence from, among others, the Lord Advocate and the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs.
10:40 Meeting continued in private until 10:52.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Good morning, and welcome to the 11th meeting in 2025 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. This was scheduled to be our final meeting before the summer recess but, unusually, we will meet next Wednesday, when we will take evidence from the Lord Advocate, the Scottish Children’s Reporter Administration and the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs.
Agenda item 1 is a decision on whether to take agenda item 4, which relates to the consideration of our work programme, in private. Do we agree to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
If members have no further comments or suggestions for action, does the committee agree to close the petition on the basis of the Scottish Government’s position?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Yes, I understand that the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee has agreed to undertake a review of the issues raised, in parallel to the petition. I think that, in this instance, that might be the best thing that we can do, given parliamentary time.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 June 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you, Mr Ewing. We will hold the petition open until we gain the information that we seek.