The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3397 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
If that is the case, what is the issue? You have cross-party support, but not cross-party action.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Mr Bibby, do you have a follow-up question?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Does anybody want to chip in on that?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
The last of the road petitions is PE2132, lodged by the Inverness Courier, which calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to publish a clear timeline for the dualling of the A96 between Inverness and Nairn and the construction of a bypass for Nairn and to ensure that the timeline is made public by Easter 2025—which ended two days ago.
During the evidence session on 2 April, the cabinet secretary confirmed that the procedural steps for the acquisition of land had been concluded, and we understand that Scottish ministers took title to the land in question earlier this week. We also heard that the potential use of the mutual investment model to fund the dualling of the A96 from Inverness to Nairn is currently being consulted on as part of engagement with industry. The cabinet secretary indicated that the timetable for the project will be determined by the type of procurement that the Government decides to progress. She also indicated a willingness to provide a statement to the Parliament on dualling the A96 Inverness to Nairn bypass before the end of the current parliamentary session—that would be a statement, at least.
Mr Ewing raised the issue of the certainty that could be provided to the public and contractors by having a long-term plan for road infrastructure plans, noting the approach that has been taken in Germany over a 30-year period. Although the cabinet secretary acknowledged that constructive suggestion, she also highlighted the challenges involved in adopting such an approach, particularly as we await the outcome of the UK Government’s capital spending review, which will subsequently inform the update to the Scottish Government’s infrastructure investment plan.
Do members have any comments or suggestions for action???
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Are colleagues content to do that?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
It is an important petition and we thank the petitioners for it, but in the light of the cabinet secretary’s evidence, that draws to a conclusion—for the time being at least—our consideration of it.
Do members have any comments or suggestions for action on PE1657?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Are colleagues content to proceed on that basis?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
PE2136, lodged by Fiona Drouet, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to make non-fatal strangulation a stand-alone criminal offence in Scotland. As I said earlier, we are joined by our colleague Tess White.
We last considered the petition on 19 March, when we agreed to write to the Cabinet Secretary for Justice and Home Affairs, inviting her to give evidence on the petition at a future meeting once a response had been received. The cabinet secretary’s response states that officials have had discussions with operational partners on the petition and will continue to engage with stakeholders, including the petitioner. The cabinet secretary outlines the range of crime types under which a physical attack involving non-fatal strangulation could be recorded, including attempted murder, serious assault, common assault, robbery, rape or attempted rape, and sexual assault. The submission states that, where non-fatal strangulation is present within sexual offending, that will be reflected in the prosecutorial action taken.
The response informs us that there is currently no individual marking used to record and monitor instances of non-fatal strangulation being reported as part of an offence. Similarly, regarding convictions, there appears to be no specific charge code for common assault when non-fatal strangulation is a component of the offence.
We have also been made aware that the Criminal Justice Committee, subject to final agreement at its meeting this morning, is planning to take oral evidence from a number of bodies on the issue of non-fatal strangulation. In the circumstances, a viable option for the committee is to refer the petition to the Criminal Justice Committee, which is planning to take evidence on the issues that it raises.
Before I seek the views of committee colleagues, I invite Tess White to address the committee.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
Well, I hope that that actually will be the committee’s recommendation. Thank you very much, Tess White. Do colleagues have any suggestions for action?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 April 2025
Jackson Carlaw
I rather took that point from Jillian Gibson’s earlier statement. I will come to you now, Jillian. It seems that, although you are grateful for the support of all the political parties, you feel that, unless something happens, the immediate prognosis could be one of reversal rather than progress. We have to be realistic and alert to that when we are considering the issue. What are your final thoughts?