The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3640 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Are we content to operate on that basis? At the same time, as we customarily do, we will alert the petitioner to the fact that, if the review does not advance the issues that they have identified, it is open to them to lodge a fresh petition at a later date. Do members agree to do that?
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Would that be to pass on the petition, or is the suggestion that we close the petition but encapsulate the comments of the petitioner, as Fergus Ewing has suggested, in a letter to the minister, and that we write to the Social Security and Social Justice Committee highlighting the concerns that the petitioner has raised?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
PE1931 is about improving the reaching 100 per cent—R100—programme roll-out by prioritising properties that currently have speeds of less than 5 megabits per second. The petition, lodged by Ian Barker, calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to prevent digital exclusion for rural properties and their households. We last considered the petition on 8 March, when we agreed to write to the Scottish Government.
For context, Ofcom research found that 10Mbps of download speed was the minimum speed that is needed to meet an average household’s digital needs. That speed was set back in 2018. The Scottish Government response indicates that superfast broadband access has been made available to 62,000 more premises since 2022, and it states that the networks that are being delivered will support download speeds of up to 1,000Mbps. The submission also provides details about the Scotland full fibre charter.
Do members have any comments or suggestions as to how we might proceed?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Good morning, and welcome to the 17th meeting in 2023 of the Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee. Before we move to the substantive items on the agenda, I ask, under item 1, whether members are content for us to take in private item 4, under which we will discuss the evidence that we hear today.
Members indicated agreement.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
I am sorry, but that is the name of the petition.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Our job is to advance the petitioner. I am sorry, but I am not here to criticise the petitioner and neither are you.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
The 6VT facility that we saw in Edinburgh was very much evidence of that.
The Milton group flagged up the home and family circumstances of the perpetrators of violence. You have spoken at length about the breakdown in the preventative work and agenda that might have been there 20 years ago and which needs to exist in order to try to stave off youth violence at the earliest point. Where that fails and where there is violence, is there a robust police and prosecution response in place to protect young people when others attack them? When it got from whatever we would prefer to be in place to violence having taken place, the people who we heard from felt let down in terms of the ability of the police to respond, the ability of the security guard to intervene or the prosecution response that took place after that.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
To echo what was said, because of that position, the perpetrators of the violence were outside the homes of those against whom they had perpetrated the violence, laughing at them and taunting them further, because there is no police or restorative process. Are those people right to feel let down?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you both very much. That has been very helpful.
In the new year, we will take evidence from people with practical experience of addressing youth violence and supporting victims, as part of the extension of our inquiry underpinning the petition from Alex O’Kane. With that in mind, the committee will have a quick discussion at the end of the meeting and then reflect on the evidence at a later date.
I thank both witnesses very much for their time.
11:23 Meeting suspended.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 22 November 2023
Jackson Carlaw
Yes, that is correct.