The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3640 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
That was a very evenly put question. Alison Irvine, would you like to respond?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Thank you. Mr Ewing has another question and I would like to go back to a couple of things. This is a slightly more circular approach, because I want to go back to the more historical aspect.
We are grateful for all the material that you were able to supply, which was quite a high pile when it was all stacked up and took quite a bit of digesting. One aspect that I wrestled with slightly was that for a great deal of time there was a conviction that the project could be delivered by 2025, which was evident throughout all the written submissions and evidence that we got by way of our inquiries and the material that we asked for.
Somewhere around 2018 or 2019 there was a change and discussions seemed to emerge about different funding models for the project, which did not feature in any of the narrative that have I read on what was happening up to that point. What is not clear to me is where the direction that was given for consideration of alternative funding models came from. Did it come from ministers and civil servants down or did it come from Transport Scotland up?
When I read all that, I was unclear why that area of discussion opened up at that point and who was leading on it. Where did the direction that was given for that change come from?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Alison, I think that that might be for you.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
That, I think, is an indication.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Okay—thank you very much. I am not sure I have fully understood or come to an appreciation of what happened at that point.
David Torrance has indicated that he wishes to come back in again.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
That is noted for the record.
Thank you all very much for joining us this morning. I am really very appreciative of you working within the restrictions imposed across the country today, and for everything that you have contributed.
11:15 Meeting suspended.Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
The point about individuals being able to participate in interview processes was well made. That is a comprehensive list of suggestions. Do colleagues have any additional suggestions?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
We will keep the petition open and take forward the action that the committee has agreed to take.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Our next continued petition is PE1876, which was lodged by Lucy Hunter Blackburn, Lisa Mackenzie and Kath Murray—despite my wonky eyesight, I might have seen some of them in the public gallery. The petition calls on the Scottish Parliament to urge the Scottish Government to require Police Scotland, the Crown Office and the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service to accurately record the sex of people who are charged with or convicted of rape or attempted rape.
We previously considered the petition on 6 December last year, when we took evidence from two of the petitioners: Dr Lucy Hunter Blackburn and Lisa Mackenzie. During the evidence session, we heard the petitioners’ concerns about a lack of ethical leadership from the Scottish Government and Police Scotland on the policy of recording crime statistics and about the possible impact on wider public policy decisions and the allocation of resources. We also explored the issue of public trust in statistics and whether there might be local variations in the way in which the police record data on rape and sexual offences. The committee felt that important issues were raised in the evidence session.
Do members have any comments or suggestions for action?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 24 January 2024
Jackson Carlaw
Absolutely. We should congratulate the petitioner again. When writing to the cabinet secretary, we might point out that, although Mr Isted is not an ageing individual, unlike me and other members of the committee, he is set to leave primary school eventually, so it would be nice if we were able to take forward, to some extent, the aims of his petition.
Do we agree to take that approach?
Members indicated agreement.