The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1505 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Alasdair Allan
In 2019, SEPA put in place revised arrangements for monitoring, particularly for finfish aquaculture. I realise that the witnesses have expressed their concerns, but are the revised arrangements that have been in place since 2019 any better from an environmental point of view?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Alasdair Allan
This subject has been touched on already. We have mentioned the interaction between farmed salmon and wild salmon. Can you say a little about the data on that? More specifically, in your view, are regulations keeping up with issues around that interaction?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Alasdair Allan
Thank you, convener. Can you hear me?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 5 June 2024
Alasdair Allan
You have mentioned what you see as shortcomings in this situation, and you have talked about resources for SEPA. Are you advocating a change in its powers or simply a change in the way that it operates?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Alasdair Allan
I do not see any reason not to accede to the request for a change to the name, which might be simpler than the other options.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 30 May 2024
Alasdair Allan
As members will know, a number of colleges have undertaken restructuring exercises, including the one at UHI North, West and Hebrides. What engagement has the Scottish Government had with the college and its staff throughout the on-going dispute, particularly given the impact that the loss of even a small number of jobs can have in a rural community?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Alasdair Allan
No, thank you.
As our committee report mentions, it is disappointing—to put it mildly—that the committee’s deliberations were in the papers before they were even finalised. All that needs to change. The bigger picture—I appreciate that the question is separate from, but related to, the specific case—is that the Parliament has to have better systems in place for the future. As our report indicates, the committee has an appetite for helping to review some of those issues, going forward.
In the first century AD, the Roman satirist Juvenal famously asked:
“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?”
or,
“Who will guard the guards?”
In other words, whose job is it to police those whose job it is to police the rules? That has never proved to be an easy question for anyone to answer.
What can be said is that the answer that we have come up with to that question in Holyrood is open to improvement. In fact, it is ripe for reform. Other legislatures do not ask a room full of politicians to reach a non-political view about an allegation against another politician. They certainly do not ask them to do so in the run-up to a national election—yet, our Parliament likes to do exactly that, as Patrick Harvie has rightly said. Nor do a number of other parliaments ask such committees to impose penalties without reference to any clearly understood scale of severity, under rules that are not always clear and do not include a right to repeal, or ask parliamentary staff in such investigations to be put in the unfair position of writing binding reports in which their colleagues are mentioned.
To anyone who is looking in on the debate, I frankly admit that there has been a lot more political heat than procedural light in the chamber. I will conclude by simply saying this: I believe that it is now time for a proper review of how the Parliament deals with allegations against its members. The public have a right to know that such decisions will be reached according to the highest and most objective of standards.
We should learn from the example of other legislatures, where the investigation is handed over to a person from outside both the political sphere and the parliamentary staff, with that person’s recommendations being put to Parliament or its committees for a recommended sanction that is based on some kind of logical scheme. I think that that would be a good place to start, and it would be an approach that the public would expect of us in the future.
17:08Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Alasdair Allan
Will the member give way?
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Alasdair Allan
Douglas Ross might have forgotten but, when I attempted to intervene on him some minutes ago, he was making the claim that I had never raised the issue of a member of the committee having tweeted about matters in advance. I was not going to say this, but I did privately raise the issue with the convener of the committee. That was supposed to be in private—not that everything from the committee was in private.
Meeting of the Parliament
Meeting date: 29 May 2024
Alasdair Allan
Will the member give way?