Chamber and committees

The Scottish Government seeks to ensure that executive pay is kept under control, and I can comment on the situation in the wider public sector in that regard. As I said, public sector pay policy includes a presumption against non-consolidated bonuses. When new chief executives have come into post, we have sought controls on wages and bonuses to be put in place.

I do not dispute Richard Leonard’s central point about the scale of the bonuses, but I return to the point that I made in my original answer, which is that, contrary to the inference in the question, the bonuses were provided publicly and within the rules.

Scottish Water has a long-standing exemption on the point of public sector pay policy, in recognition of its operating model and the need to retain staff as it competes with the private sector. That arrangement has been in place since 2011.

The framework for bonus payments has to be approved by the Scottish ministers. The current framework was approved in advance of the 2021-27 regulatory period. The Scottish Government is satisfied that the correct process has been followed by the Scottish Water board. Scottish Water is publicly owned, which means that, unlike at the private companies that operate elsewhere, money raised is reinvested in our water industry, while our water charges remain lower, on average, than is the case in other parts of the United Kingdom.

As I mentioned, Scottish Water has a good story to tell about its wider performance, but I recognise Beatrice Wishart’s point about the need for continuing investment. There is continuing investment—in fact, £1 billion has been invested in the water network around the country, and we will seek to provide more investment. Scottish Water is taking action and is committing up to £500 million to improve water quality, increase monitoring of the highest-priority waters and, as I mentioned, deal with spills and overflows.

In his original question, the member suggested that public sector pay policy prohibits what has taken place, which is not the case. As I mentioned, public sector pay policy has a presumption against non-consolidated bonuses and suspended bonuses. However, with the agreement of the Scottish ministers, Scottish Water has had a pay structure that includes performance-related pay since its creation, in 2002. That is simply because Scottish Water operates in an environment in which the other water companies around the UK are in the private sector and Scottish Water has to recruit from the same pool of people.

Even in circumstances in which proposals for solar are not covered by the generous permitted development rights that I have mentioned, people still have the option of applying for permission to install panels. That will be a matter for the planning authority, and such applications will be considered, taking account of and weighing up the very supportive renewable energy policy in national planning framework 4, alongside policy relating to heritage objectives and any other relevant considerations.

In May last year, the Scottish Government amended permitted development rights to allow solar panels and replacement windows to be installed on domestic and non-domestic buildings in conservation areas without the need for a planning application. That important change strikes an appropriate balance between tackling climate change and protecting important historic buildings and townscapes. Those rights are subject to specific restrictions, such as allowing solar panels to the rear of buildings in conservation areas.

Details on the consenting process are set out in the Electricity (Applications for Consent) Regulations 1990 and the Electricity Works (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2017. That is United Kingdom law that is applicable in Scotland.

Developments under 50MW are determined by planning authorities in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013. We are considering recent advice and modelling published by the National Energy System Operator, along with the measures in the UK Government’s clean power action plan, to inform our approach.

I agree whole-heartedly with Ms Whitham about the need to support the upskilling of businesses and organisations across our economy. That is vital if we are to deliver the changes that are needed for net zero and if we are to realise the significant benefits of adopting more efficient and sustainable practices.

As I have said, the Scottish Government continues to provide support for carbon literacy through our enterprise agencies and our work across the public sector, but we also need to see action from outwith Government. That is why I welcome the efforts of businesses such as The Way Forward 2045, which Elena Whitham highlighted and which she has mentioned in parliamentary motions.

In the past year, that business has been shortlisted for a VIBES Scottish environment business award in the just transition category. That kind of recognition is a further way in which we are encouraging positive change and greater carbon literacy across our economy.

A number of the interventions that I just mentioned are very much about the here and now. The Falkirk Council motion and Michelle Thomson have highlighted the tension that is at the heart of what the partners are doing to ensure that Grangemouth has a key role to play in Scotland’s net zero future. However, as Michelle Thomson said, we must also consider the here and now. It was disappointing to hear nothing at all from the chancellor yesterday—not a single commitment or comment—that would either help to avoid an abrupt and unnecessary closure of the refinery or support Grangemouth’s transition to play its part in Scotland’s green economy.

We need all the partners on the Grangemouth future industry board to work together constructively and with real urgency to do all that they can to progress the project willow recommendations when the report is produced. Given that it will fall to the UK Government to use its reserved powers to progress many of those recommendations, and given that the UK Government co-chairs the board, we will need the Labour Government to do what it has said it will do.

Scotland’s national planning framework ensures that the potential impacts of developments on communities and nature are important considerations in decision making. All applications are subject to site-specific assessments—[Interruption.] Are there problems with the microphone?