The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1731 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
Again, I have to come back to the consequences of the choice that is before us. Minister, am I right that you are saying that not passing the SSI would mean opening up schemes to production organisations in England?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
What would the consequences be for your budget, and what cuts would you have to consider?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
I hate to repeat myself, but whatever people’s views are about the SSI and potential alternative schemes, I cannot understand why anyone on the committee would think that it would be responsible politics to put the Government into a position where it would have to cut the agriculture budget. Have we any indication of what the different parts of the agriculture sector think about the Scottish Government being put in that position?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
Likewise, I am not sure that any of us have much more to add to this, but Emma Harper talked about some of the consequences of not passing the SSI, and Ariane Burgess mentioned the importance of small producers. Specifically, what would be the impact on the small producers sector of not passing the SSI?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
I hear what Mr Balfour says, and I echo what has been said about his dedication to supporting disabled people. However, before we set up any false divisions, will he acknowledge that many of us have campaigned for both Gaelic and BSL?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
Looking back on the legislation as someone who was involved in it at the Government end, I think that Karen Adam touches on an important point, which is the importance of BSL as a language and all the human dignity that that implies. I realise that the act is about more than symbolism, but does she agree, as I am sure she will, about the impact that it made on that community to know that, symbolically, the country had recognised their language for what it is, which is a language?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
As we rightly consider these figures, does the cabinet secretary agree that we also have a responsibility to ensure that we recognise the economic importance of salmon farming to the Highlands and Islands, not least in my own constituency?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
Does the First Minister agree that, whatever solution is found to the tender in question, the decision must be informed by the views of people in Uist and other island communities, who clearly want to see new vessels in service as soon as is feasible?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
I believe that amendment 39 responds directly to the concerns that have been expressed by crofters, tenant farmers and rural communities that, as we have heard, face increasing damage from rising deer numbers. I am grateful that the Government has been willing to work with me on the amendment.
Currently, occupiers and tenants can act only on improved land and enclosed woodland, which leaves moorland and common grazings vulnerable. As everyone knows, deer move freely across those landscapes, causing harm to crops, woodland regeneration and livestock and contributing to tick-borne diseases such as Lyme disease and louping ill.
Amendment 39 will extend to all types of land, including moorland, the right of tenants to take or kill deer and will empower grazing committees to act collectively in that regard. It is a simple and low-cost measure that will support Scotland’s biodiversity and our national target to reduce deer densities by 50,000 annually.
On Rhoda Grant’s point, I do not feel that our aims are in conflict. I think that she was referring to amendment 70 or other amendments. I hope that amendment 39 will provide a good sound way to empower tenants with the same rights to control such issues as landowners have. If she feels that there are still outstanding issues, I hope that we will be able to work on them at stage 3.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
Yes.