The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1720 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
Given what you have said about the conversations with the sector, what would be the implications for the wider good food agenda if the Parliament were not to approve the instrument?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
You mentioned that you are keen to maintain a voluntary approach, but you also acknowledge that that does not always work in every community when it comes to controlling deer numbers. Is the voluntary approach, as it has operated up to now, adequate to deal with the problem?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
If a landlord does not know where his tenants are, there is something wrong with the landlord, frankly. Also, if that criticism can be levelled at tenants, I am not sure why it cannot be levelled at landlords. [Interruption.]
If you will let me finish, I am not saying that to make a point against landlords. I am just saying that it is an issue of safety and I do not see any reason why passing the amendment means that we are not saying that tenants have to, should and must live up to all the same safety obligations, for example, as landlords and their shooting guests.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
I appreciate that there might be—I am going to get the term wrong. Is it sporting tenants?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
Will the member give way?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
I am sure that the member is about to explain this, but I am unclear as to why tenants would not have to live by all the same safety rules and expectations as their landlords.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
Sporting tenants might have rights and exercise those rights rather than the landlord, and I accept that. However, I do not feel that it leaves anyone in the Government or elsewhere liable if tenants can ensure that their land and interests are not damaged by large numbers of deer. I have worked with the Government and managed to come up with an amendment that would ensure that tenants have those rights.
Mr Eagle makes an important point about communication, however, and I did not mean to be flippant in response. There is a need for communication, whether it is with the landlord or the sporting tenant, to make sure that this is all done responsibly.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
We might return to some of those questions at stage 3. However, I am reluctant to pass an amendment that introduces another level of bureaucracy. I accept the point about safety, but that would introduce a level of bureaucracy around notifications that would essentially make it impossible for a tenant to act when his or her interests are threatened by the presence of deer. I would not like to go down that route.
19:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
That would be my hope, minister.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
The Government would have to comment on whether it thinks that it would be liable, but I do not think that it would be.
A crofter pointed out to me that property rights operate in a slightly asymmetrical way as regards deer. If a crofter’s car is hit by a deer for example, the landlord does not claim any responsibility for that deer, as it is a wild animal. Without legislation of the kind I am proposing, at the moment, a crofter who takes action against deer that are damaging his interests could be said to be infringing on the rights of a landowner or a sporting tenant. As far as I am concerned, that is two contradictory definitions of a deer.