The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1714 contributions
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
Does the First Minister agree that, whatever solution is found to the tender in question, the decision must be informed by the views of people in Uist and other island communities, who clearly want to see new vessels in service as soon as is feasible?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
I believe that amendment 39 responds directly to the concerns that have been expressed by crofters, tenant farmers and rural communities that, as we have heard, face increasing damage from rising deer numbers. I am grateful that the Government has been willing to work with me on the amendment.
Currently, occupiers and tenants can act only on improved land and enclosed woodland, which leaves moorland and common grazings vulnerable. As everyone knows, deer move freely across those landscapes, causing harm to crops, woodland regeneration and livestock and contributing to tick-borne diseases such as Lyme disease and louping ill.
Amendment 39 will extend to all types of land, including moorland, the right of tenants to take or kill deer and will empower grazing committees to act collectively in that regard. It is a simple and low-cost measure that will support Scotland’s biodiversity and our national target to reduce deer densities by 50,000 annually.
On Rhoda Grant’s point, I do not feel that our aims are in conflict. I think that she was referring to amendment 70 or other amendments. I hope that amendment 39 will provide a good sound way to empower tenants with the same rights to control such issues as landowners have. If she feels that there are still outstanding issues, I hope that we will be able to work on them at stage 3.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
Yes.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
In responding to the committee on this issue, as you have just mentioned, you highlighted areas that are not specified in the SSI because they are already specified elsewhere—in other legislation. How do you ensure clarity, given that things are specified in different pieces of legislation?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
Given what you have said about the conversations with the sector, what would be the implications for the wider good food agenda if the Parliament were not to approve the instrument?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
You mentioned that you are keen to maintain a voluntary approach, but you also acknowledge that that does not always work in every community when it comes to controlling deer numbers. Is the voluntary approach, as it has operated up to now, adequate to deal with the problem?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
If a landlord does not know where his tenants are, there is something wrong with the landlord, frankly. Also, if that criticism can be levelled at tenants, I am not sure why it cannot be levelled at landlords. [Interruption.]
If you will let me finish, I am not saying that to make a point against landlords. I am just saying that it is an issue of safety and I do not see any reason why passing the amendment means that we are not saying that tenants have to, should and must live up to all the same safety obligations, for example, as landlords and their shooting guests.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
I appreciate that there might be—I am going to get the term wrong. Is it sporting tenants?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
Will the member give way?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Alasdair Allan
I am sure that the member is about to explain this, but I am unclear as to why tenants would not have to live by all the same safety rules and expectations as their landlords.