The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 785 contributions
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
George Adam
Will the minister take an intervention?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
George Adam
What Pam Duncan-Glancy is trying to do is not a bad thing—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
George Adam
—and we have all agreed that it is a good idea to try to find the children and young people who we need to help.
You mentioned the evidence that we have received from Mr Dey. It is quite a complex matter. Is the bill the place for addressing it, or is it better for Mr Dey to do something and come back with a complex idea of how we can address the issue?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
George Adam
During the bill’s progress through stage 1, I said that the education landscape is already like an MGM musical in full Technicolor—Ross Greer used a similar line the other day. It is massive—
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
George Adam
My point is whether we think that it is right to add another body rather than fix what we have already. The whole idea is about relationships. You cannot legislate for relationships when trying to make things work. I hear what the convener says, but I still feel that this is overlegislating for the sake of it.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
George Adam
I looked at the amendment and all the evidence from stage 1. Is there anything from stage 1 that you can point to? Even Ken Muir said that it would probably cause more confusion.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
George Adam
I am sorry, but may I intervene again?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
George Adam
This is my question: I pointed out something that Professor Muir said, so can you, Mr Kerr, point out something from stage 1 that backs your position?
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
George Adam
I understand where Pam Duncan-Glancy is trying to go, but alarm bells start going off in my head—that might say a lot about me—when I hear people making suggestions that might make things more complicated. Might the proposal end up making the consultation a tick-box exercise? Might we end up in a situation in which the structure is so tight that we cannot get things done, as people will end up reporting things instead of doing the work? The issue of proposals making things so tight that flexibility is lost is a concern that I have in relation not only to this bill but to just about every bit of legislation that I see.
Education, Children and Young People Committee
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
George Adam
I am with Willie Rennie on the idea that the SQA has changed and things have moved on. A lot of what we are discussing and a lot of the amendments are a result of pushback because of the historical position that we have had with the SQA.
With the amendments in this group, I know that you are trying to find a solution to a perceived issue, but is it not too much to create another body or appoint a new individual? I am checking whether this is in the amendments, but would the role be created through the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body? From looking at the amendment, I cannot see that, and I have concerns about how the individual would themselves be scrutinised. They could be so independent that they would be a lone wolf.