The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 774 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thank you, convener. We have been trying to understand what the driver is for that. Why are people proposing commissioners? We are not exactly an under-governed country: we have 129 MSPs, 57 MPs, 20-something Government ministers and 130-something Government bodies. Why do people want more commissioners? One thing that has been said to us is that it is because people feel frustrated that there is a failure in delivery and in what the Government is trying to do, and they see a commissioner as a way to force the pace of change. Do you have any thoughts on that? Do you recognise that concern?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
To be fair, we recognise that there is a difference.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
Okay. Thank you.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
Of course. The point that I am trying to get to is: what is the added value of a commissioner, as opposed to cross-party parliamentary committees that produce reports? As a minister, if you have a critical report from a commissioner and a critical report from a parliamentary committee, which of those do you think has more weight?
09:45SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning, minister and officials. One issue that the committee has been considering is the rationale behind the drive to create new commissioners. You will be aware that there are three proposals in train; there might be others in the ether. There are people wanting to create new commissioners around disability, older people and—what is the third one?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thank you for that. I am interested in how you, as a minister or as part of the Government, view commissioners? What is the value of an independent, SPCB-supported commissioner, as opposed to MSPs, MPs and others?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
I am looking at the convener of the Public Audit Committee, who is sitting two seats along from me. That committee regularly produces reports that are critical of the Government, which I am sure that ministers are awake to and pay attention to.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
As a minister, what is more likely to keep you awake at night: a report from a commissioner or a report from a parliamentary committee—assuming that the report in question is critical?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
That was a very diplomatic answer.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Murdo Fraser
Yes. So, you are saying that it is more about the outside noise that could be generated.