The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 956 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Murdo Fraser
:The bill suggests that the cost will be £12 million across the UK, and it might be assumed that Scotland will bear a proportionate share of that across the public sector. However, you do not expect that to be a major burden.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Murdo Fraser
Good morning, cabinet secretary. I want to move on to some slightly more practical issues with regard to the legislation. I appreciate this is not a Scottish Government bill but a UK Government bill, but it will have an impact on Scotland. Given what you have said, I assume that the Scottish Government is, generally speaking, supportive of the direction of travel and recognises the need for the bill, but it will come at a cost not only to business, and particularly suppliers to the private sector in fields such as IT, but to the public sector—for example, the national health service. Has the Scottish Government done any assessment of the likely cost either to business and the private sector or to the public sector?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 March 2026
Murdo Fraser
:Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 18 February 2026
Murdo Fraser
I welcome the Government’s amendment in response to concerns from the Faculty of Advocates. The one point that occurred to me—we touched on this in stage 1 evidence—is whether the term “good faith” requires to be more accurately defined. Has the Government given any thought to that?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
We could debate the figures all day. Figures from SPICe show that the 2025-26 capital budget for Scottish Enterprise was £90.1 million, whereas it is £89.5 million in the budget that has just been presented. That is a reduction, not an increase.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
We will let the Scottish Government and SPICe fight it out.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
We do not have to leave the window open.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
I would like to get a clarification on the record from the minister. It is my understanding, from looking at the instrument and the background proposals, that the instrument will have no impact on UK service providers but will apply only to those that are overseas and seek to trade in the UK. Could the minister clarify that on the record?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
I just saw him break out in a cold sweat.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Murdo Fraser
Amendments 17 and 20 in the group are in my name. Amendment 17 deals with the question of targets in community wealth building plans for public procurement spend with local economic operators. The issue was raised with the committee by a number of witnesses who gave evidence at stage 1—most notably, the Federation of Small Businesses, which is particularly keen that community wealth building is used a means of supporting the local business community.
In line with my general approach to the bill, which I do not want to be cluttered with lots of provisions, amendment 17 is intended to be relatively light in touch. It does not specify what the target should be. It would be for the local organisation that prepares the plan—for example, the local authority—to set the target. That target might indeed be zero—which would not, of course, be helpful—but the intention is to put something in the bill to require the setting of a target, therefore encouraging more public money to be spent on supporting local communities.
Convener, I notice that your amendment 27 is similar in approach. I prefer my approach because it is lighter in touch than yours, which is overly prescriptive. We are in the same general territory but amendment 17 is neater and cleaner and imposes fewer obligations on the organisations that prepare community wealth building plans. I therefore commend amendment 17 to colleagues as it allows maximum local flexibility, as I have outlined.
Amendment 20 is consequential in essence and seeks to require reporting on the matter. Every community wealth building partnership would, at the end of every financial year, have to prepare a report setting out the percentage of total spend on public procurement contracts with local economic operators, and publish that, so that it was transparent.
I move amendment 17.