The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 889 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Murdo Fraser
A lot of what I was going to ask has already been covered, so I will not go over old ground, but I want to pick up on Gordon MacDonald’s last point about reskilling people and contextualise that. In the past 20 years, Scotland has had a lot of people in the economy working in call centres. For example, 10 years ago, if I wanted to speak to my energy supplier, I would pick up the phone and speak to somebody in a call centre. Now, everything is on the app, and I am speaking to something which is probably a computer and not a human being because it is all done through ChatGPT. Will we see the death of call centre jobs because they are all being replaced by AI and, if we are, what will happen to the people who have those jobs?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Murdo Fraser
I visited Babcock on Friday. The company is absolutely flying, which is great, and it is struggling to fill vacancies. Going back to my colleague Stephen Kerr’s questioning, do you think that our education and training set-up is fleet of foot enough to keep up with these changes in the economy?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Murdo Fraser
That is very interesting. We could go down that rabbit hole, but that would be a different conversation.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning. I want to follow up the earlier line of questioning around data centres. Peter, you were talking about grid issues. I met SSE Transmission on Monday and we were talking about that. Its view is that, right now, Scotland is not a greatly attractive place to put data centres due to what it called the latency of the grid, by which it means the reliability. We can get there, as you fairly said, but that will require huge upgrades in transmission and much more battery and pump storage. That is years away and will come at massive cost. I do not know whether you have any thoughts on what the likely timescale is for getting a data centre built here. From what the SSE people were saying, we are talking five or 10 years at least.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Murdo Fraser
For now.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Murdo Fraser
You have given us a lot to think about. Thank you very much.
11:15Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Murdo Fraser
Okay, that was it, unless anybody else wants to add to that.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Murdo Fraser
I thank colleagues who commented on my amendments. I am grateful to Bob Doris for his comments; he made a reasonable point about the additional detail that might be required. Should amendment 148 be successful at stage 2, there would be an opportunity to address some of those concerns with amendments at stage 3.
There is an important point of principle in relation to the correct placing of an assisted dying service and whether it should be within the NHS. I am aware that there are many practitioners in the NHS who are deeply uncomfortable with the concept that the NHS, which they joined to save and preserve life, would have, as part of it, a service that is committed to helping people to end their lives. There would be many in the NHS who would be much more comfortable if there were to be a separate, stand-alone service providing assisted dying, rather than it being part of the NHS.
I remind members, as I am sure that they are aware, that the Dignitas service that operates in Switzerland—which people in this country sometimes avail themselves of—operates not in the public health sphere but as a private service. Therefore, there is precedent for services to be provided in different ways elsewhere. The amendment provides an important point of principle. For that reason, I press amendment 148.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Murdo Fraser
That would have to be agreed as the procedures for assisted dying are progressed. Generally speaking, notaries public are private individuals who operate in firms of solicitors and they would normally make a charge for witnessing documents. In my experience, that would not be a large charge. It would tend to be a modest charge, but the cost would have to be borne in mind.
The amendment would put in an important safeguard to ensure that there are additional protections in the event that someone is using a proxy as opposed to signing on their own behalf.
I move amendment 149.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Murdo Fraser
I suggest that the purpose of the 1967 act was to protect the lives of mothers, who, in many cases, were potentially at risk from continuing with a pregnancy. I understand the point that Dr Gulhane is making, but I am not sure that it is salient to the argument that I am making.
My amendment 148 seeks to establish a statutory independent body that would be responsible for administering the functions of the act. That body would be separate from the NHS and would oversee all aspects of the process: receiving and recording declarations, co-ordinating assessments, authorising practitioners, arranging for the provision of the approved substance, maintaining compliance, and reporting outcomes. In creating an independent agency, we would make a clear moral distinction between a service that was dedicated to preserving life and a mechanism that was authorised by the state to end it.