The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 747 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning. My question follows on very neatly from what Nathalie Agnew just said. The new deal for business was established by the Government because of a sense that it was disconnected from the business community, but it follows on from a range of different talking shops and forums and resets that we have had over the years.
I am interested in your perception. To what extent is the new deal for business qualitatively different from what has gone before? Specifically, can you point to any tangible outcomes from the new deal for business that have made a difference that otherwise would not have happened? Jane Wood, do you want to start?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
My question was about—
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
That is fine. Claire Mack, do you want to add anything?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Do you want to add something, Nathalie Agnew—perhaps briefly? You are all doing a great job but not really keeping to the convener’s rules about short answers.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thank you. I saw Leon Thompson nodding along to that.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
If only we had a train station in St Andrews—but that is a debate for another day.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thank you. That was very helpful. We will put the same question to the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner when he appears before us.
We are interested in the arguments around the creation of new commissioners. I know that you have said in your written submission that that is not something that you want to say much about, but do you have any views that you want to share with the committee on that? As you probably know, a number of proposals to create new commissioners, mainly in the advocacy space, are in train. Indeed, some are already going through the parliamentary process.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Good morning, Mr Hamilton. The committee is looking not only at the case for creating new commissioners but at the landscape of existing commissioners. I think that you said as much in response to the convener’s questions a moment ago, but your submission says that
“It is a mistake to lump”
commissioners
“together as a homogenous entity”,
because, as you have fairly said, they have very different roles. This morning, we will hear from both you and the Scottish Biometrics Commissioner. In your view, is there any synergy between your work and the work of the Biometrics Commissioner?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thank you for that. What you have said is very much in line with some of the evidence that the Finance and Public Administration Committee heard on the matter. The drive to create commissioners was led, to an extent, by people’s frustration about public services. The committee will consider that.
I have one more question, and it is about the location of the office. I know the town of St Andrews well; it is part of the region that I represent. It is a lovely place but a very expensive location for property—some of the most expensive streets in Scotland are in St Andrews. Is St Andrews really the best place to have a public body like yours? Are there not more cost-effective options, even in Fife? I represent Fife and I am very keen that the organisation stays in Fife, but is St Andrews really the best place for it?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee
Meeting date: 20 February 2025
Murdo Fraser
Thank you. That was a helpful overview. I would like to get a better understanding of how the shared service model works in practice, from the point of view of lines of accountability and who pays for what. You gave the example of your media output, which is provided from elsewhere. How does that work in practice in relation to your budget? Do you make a financial contribution to that?