The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 747 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Murdo Fraser
I go back to the question of funding, which was touched on earlier in Daniel Johnson’s questions. I have two specific questions. To save time, I will ask both of them at the same time.
First, to what extent have you sought to draw in any private sector funding for your deals, and how successful has that been?
Secondly, how have you sought to interact with other sources of public sector funding, such as levelling up funds, shared prosperity funds, the Scottish National Investment Bank or research and innovation funding? Going beyond the narrow scope of the funding in the deals, have you been able to look at other public sector sources?
Mr O’Farrell, you are looking at me, so I will start with you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Murdo Fraser
Given that you are in the unique position of straddling the border between Scotland and England, is there any difference in the approach to funding in England in comparison with Scotland?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Murdo Fraser
That is interesting. Thank you.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Murdo Fraser
My second question is on a slightly different topic, which is the timescale for the deal. The Glasgow city deal has the longest timescale, at 20 years. For some, it is 15 years, although for most it is 10 years.
We are now 10 years into the Glasgow city deal. The world looked very different 10 years ago, and it will look even more different 10 years from now. Is the timescale realistic? What impact does it have on planning for projects? Are the projects that you have picked to be part of the deals timeless projects, in effect, that will have a benefit regardless of the changes over two decades?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Murdo Fraser
Good morning. I want to follow on from the convener’s line of questioning. I suspect, given what you have said in response to him, that I probably know the answer to this question already, but I will ask it anyway.
If we did not have the city deals, would the projects have proceeded at all? Last year, the committee went to visit the Aberdeen south harbour project, for example, and we saw the work that has been done there. There is also the Inverness castle development—I say to Matt Bailey that I am an Invernessian by birth, so it is great to see the castle being brought back into use as a tourist asset.
If we did not have the city deals, what would be the prospects for developments like those proceeding? Who wants to start?
I see that Stuart Bews wants to come in.
You should not bother touching the buttons, by the way—they will be controlled remotely.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Murdo Fraser
Does Audit Scotland have any observations on this?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Murdo Fraser
Thanks.
My second question touches on what Mr McInroy said in answer to my first, but it goes in a slightly different direction. The time period for most of the deals is 10 years; some are 15; and Glasgow’s is 20. Given how fast the economy and society are changing, can we realistically make a judgment now on whether a project will, in 20 years’ time, deliver the benefits that we think are appropriate today?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Murdo Fraser
Good morning. A lot of the questions that I was going to ask have been covered by others, but there are two things that I want to follow up on.
For the first question, I want to return to Daniel Johnson’s earlier questions and take a step back from all of this. When I look at the Tay cities deal in my area and some of the projects that have come out of it, I see the massive investment in, for example, the James Hutton Institute outside Dundee, which has been extremely beneficial, and the opening of the new Perth museum, which has been a tremendous asset to the city, with visitor numbers since its opening in April well exceeding original projections. It is a great success. My question, then, which I suppose is for Mr McInroy or Mr Mitchell, is this: if we had not had the city deals, would such projects have proceeded?
11:00Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 27 November 2024
Murdo Fraser
Did you want to add anything, Mr Mitchell?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 20 November 2024
Murdo Fraser
I want to follow up the sustainable aviation fuel issue, which the committee is really interested in and has pursued in previous lines of questioning, including with Ineos and PetroChina last week.
As it said at that time, it is also interested in the opportunity and it is part of project willow. Mr Thomson, you make a compelling case around the notion of repurposing the existing refinery and how it could be done at a relatively low cost. If you are right, why do Ineos and PetroChina not see that opportunity for itself?