The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 321 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
I will reflect on that. Whether carbon credits or anything else will be identified as property will come down to how the bill is interpreted. The bill is there to lay down the key principles of what would define digital assets as property, so the consideration of carbon credits or anything else will depend on the definition of property in a digital world.
With regard to future proofing, some witnesses—perhaps Lord Hodge or Professor Fox—made the point that, to a certain extent, we can deal only with the here and now. Technology is changing quickly, and we cannot really future proof something when the world is changing so fast and we do not know where we will be in 10 or 20 years’ time. I think that there was an acceptance that Parliament might have to deal with that once it becomes clearer, but the bill is really about dealing with the here and now.
I know that this is an open-ended debate and people will have their own views on it, but the witnesses made some good points in that regard.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
My understanding—from the expert reference group and from the evidence that was given to the committee—is that the tight definitions that you referred to were in order to differentiate between types of electronic documents, as not all electronic documents are defined as property. We have to define property, as well as other types of electronic documents.
Examples that were given to the committee, and that were given by the expert reference group, include that a digital image or an electronic document—such as an email—is not defined as property in Scots law. We therefore have to differentiate between types of electronic documents, and that is why definitions such as “immutable” or “rivalrous” come into play. They are to differentiate between what can and cannot be easily copied and what is and is not property.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
The bill’s purpose is not to solve disputes; it is to determine what digital property is. Other legislation deals with all those issues, but the bill identifies or classifies digital assets as property.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
I will bring in Fraser Gough to explain the legal background.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
As you are aware, all developments are subject to environmental assessment, and that applies to data centres as much as to any other infrastructure for AI or for the digital revolution that is taking place. As the policy evolves, we will have to have more answers to those questions, because, if the demand for energy is going to get bigger and bigger as the years go on, we are going to have to calculate what that demand will be and what impact it will have on Scotland, and we will have to look at the environmental assessments to ensure that we are working within our limits.
10:30Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
I am going to bring in colleagues. I know that Kieran Burke was keen to come in on your previous point, so if I can bring him in to talk about the policy perspective, we will come back to your point on tokenisation.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
Yes, because the purpose of all the key principles that we are speaking about relates to our attempts to stop double selling. If you were to say that every transaction would lead to more cryptocurrency, that would suggest that there is double selling, and the legislation is designed to avoid that happening.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
We are one of many jurisdictions that is trying to modernise property law to take into account digital assets. Some other jurisdictions have passed laws in recent months—the United Kingdom law is pretty fresh—so we are not behind, but we must modernise our law. That is the purpose of the bill. The economy is changing fast and I am confident that we are moving at a reasonable pace.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
There is an ability to make regulations in the bill, so that option is open to us in the future. We cannot say in advance what the need for that will be, but the ability is there in the bill.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 December 2025
Richard Lochhead
I noted that evidence, so we will reflect on that. That is all that I can say at this point.