The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2916 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Mark Ruskell
I will move on to how you are able or not able to deal with individual cases and complaints. You have probably had a couple from my office, not about ESS—not yet, anyway—but individual cases and complaints about regulators, regulatory processes and problems.
We have been faced with the challenge of advising constituents to frame their complaints in a way that points to a systemic problem with environmental law or with the way in which regulation is being enforced that is replicable across Scotland. We are trying to find some way of getting around the issue with individual complaints by pointing to those wider themes.
How are you, one year on from your last appearance before the committee, dealing with that? After all, it is a problem that, for those who are still in the European Union, the European Commission can take on and deal with individual complaints as individual complaints, while you are, in theory, quite restricted in that respect.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Mark Ruskell
So what do you see as the governance gap? Indeed, do you feel confident in talking about, say, environmental courts or other governance gaps, or is that something that you feel is not for you to look at?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Mark Ruskell
What do you think about a publicly owned freight operator? Does the Scottish Government have a view on that? Are you content for just ScotRail and Caledonian Sleeper to be in public ownership? Does it stop there?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Mark Ruskell
What about the rolling stock companies?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Mark Ruskell
Obviously, the limits of devolution kick in there.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Mark Ruskell
I will leave it there.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Mark Ruskell
Right now, beyond being an observer in the room, is part of your role to ensure that the process of target setting is on track, or are you waiting to see what the output is before starting to look at implementation?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Mark Ruskell
We are almost there already, to be honest. What about the local climate change reports?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Mark Ruskell
You will be aware of the committee’s conversation with the UK Climate Change Committee about the draft climate change plan. I am interested in your memorandum of understanding with the CCC. When the CCC came to this committee, I got the impression that resourcing is an issue. It has only two members of staff who cover Scotland, and it has a defined remit in legislation. It also strikes me that a range of bodies, including yours and Audit Scotland, have a role in guiding the action and scrutinising whether action is appropriate enough to meet the targets. Is that situation evolving? How is that reflected in your memorandum of understanding?
The CCC was quite clear about its resource constraints. Unlike ESS, it is not required to report to this committee on its resourcing requirements, which are not a matter for this Parliament.
11:45
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 March 2026
Mark Ruskell
I am aware of that.
Finally, the committee has to write a legacy report, and there is an issue that I am interested in hearing your views on. You have had quite a close relationship with this committee, and you do play a formal role in bringing improvement notices back here, but where do you think our successor committee should focus in its relationship with ESS and the priorities emerging at your end? Do you see ways in which you could engage better with the successor committee?