The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2922 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I appreciate that there is competition between private interests for the use of the seas, but the public interest in the room really lies with Mike Spain. After all, the Crown Estate could be leasing the sea bed.
Therefore, Mike, I am interested in hearing your views on the regulatory frameworks that are being established here. As I understand it, SEPA’s controlled activities regulations licensing will not apply when it comes to waste discharges, lice treatments, medicines and so on. Those things might or might not be necessary, but given that you will be leasing the sea bed in the public interest, can you tell us how that public interest is reflected in a regulatory framework that does not replicate what we have inshore, where there are some quite strict environmental limits that are monitored by a public agency?
You have been a little bit quiet this morning, so I would like to hear what the public interest says about what is before us and how you are managing private interests to ensure that the public interest in the environment is being protected.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
What you are suggesting would be very much a bespoke project—that is, the application of hydrogen heating in a particular geographic area, rather than more of a national approach to the adoption of heating in individual homes.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
John Andresen, could you share your views on that issue, and also talk about the international comparisons? Are other countries taking different approaches to which sectors are being targeted for hydrogen investment? Are there stark differences in approach?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Nigel Holmes, you mentioned the fertiliser sector; we do not have a fertiliser sector here, but it could be brought back effectively and decarbonised that way. What do you see as the areas that we need to focus most on in the hydrogen hierarchy?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Is that in the context of society becoming increasingly electrified in terms of both transport and heating, and therefore needing a back-up system to release that energy during winter or at other times when demand is high?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I would welcome that approach. Since the committee last took evidence on this issue, which was in May 2023, we have seen quite a few changes. Low-emission zones have been rolled out in Scotland; there is increasing evidence with regard to particulates from wood-burning stoves; and new scientific evidence is coming along about the impact of air pollution on child development. Therefore, I would say yes to the suggestion that has been made. Now would be a good time to reflect on the evidence, take stock and write to the stakeholders who were part of the initial inquiry.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I note that the two chemicals in question have an impact on human health. The notes say that UV-328 is
“toxic for mammals, endangering human health and the environment (causing damage to liver and kidney),”
while dechlorane affects the nervous system of aquatic animals. It is right, therefore, that those chemicals are being phased out.
Although I accept the Government’s approach and the representations that have been made by the medical industry, I note that those two chemicals will be prohibited in the European Union in autumn 2025. I am content to accept the regulations, but I would like to know whether the chemicals will be phased out on a similar timescale to that of the EU’s. Given that the chemicals have an impact on the environment and human health, phasing them out is the right thing to do.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I will go to Jan Rosenow.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Does Mark Symes want to chip in on this?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am interested in the definition of blue hydrogen as low carbon. That depends on carbon capture and storage being in place and working at a certain efficiency. I am interested in whether you see that as achievable, given that Acorn has not yet been constructed, and whether the capture rates that are predicted for Acorn have been replicable in other CCS commercial plants around the world. If the Acorn project happens, how much certainty is there that you will end up with blue hydrogen and that it will be a low-carbon product, or is there uncertainty about whether what eventually comes out of that process will be low-carbon enough?