The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2922 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
We have covered some of the areas that I wanted to ask about, but I want to go back to the issue of flexibility when it comes to protected sites and the very narrow potential use of the powers in the bill. Dr Leys, to what extent is NatureScot using the current powers in regulations 9D and 11? I get the impression that there is a reluctance to adjust the site network or make changes that could allow wider landscape-scale restoration. How are you using the existing system to make changes and variations where that makes sense to improve the environment?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
If NatureScot does not know how to apply regulations 9D and 11, should you not ask the Scottish Government how you can adapt the site network to meet the challenges of the natural environment in the 21st century? There are powers that have not been used, and there is a bit of caution. Why can we not just work with existing powers rather than change them?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
One challenge with the bill is that we do not know exactly how the Government will use the powers, so we are all gazing into crystal balls.
Is the guidance on the site network that is available to NatureScot officers on the ground routinely updated? I hear that there is some inconsistency in the way that that is applied, which is causing issues with decisions about particular features that might be allowed to expand to other designated areas.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Does the example of Beauly to Denny not prove the point that the existing system has worked? I remember the early conversations around Beauly to Denny, when there were concerns about a special protection area for birds near Blackford. That resulted in the line being moved. Clearly, the habitats regulations and the EIA process had a bearing on the development of that project. Does the current system work for industrial development and for nature or are there irreconcilable tensions that require the whole system to be changed?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I have a quick follow-up. Should part 2 be enacted, what would be ESS’s role in looking at the adequacy of existing environmental assessment regulations and habitats regulations appraisals? You will have heard the previous panel making some bespoke cases for change or adjustments. Would ESS have a role in advising ministers on what you would consider to be appropriate changes under part 2?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Is that currently part of your work plan? Is it a priority at the moment?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thanks.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
It seems to have passed. Have any developers come to the Scottish Government saying that they would like to push ahead with a development and asking it to grant them a special development order or any other kind of permission that would allow the developers to do it as a trial?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Let us turn to an area where there is a regulatory gap because SEPA’s work applies only up to 3 nautical miles out. How will that regulatory gap be closed ahead of any planning applications that could come through for developments beyond 3 nautical miles?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
To go back to my original question, will the commencement of regulations to extend SEPA’s powers align with the decision on any planning application that is made under the regulations, should they be approved?