The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2735 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
One of the challenges that we have, particularly in this committee, is that we are trying to scrutinise this plan for the very short period of time of the 120 days that is in front of Parliament. I am interested in what is missing from the plan, because the Government could go back to it after 120 days and say, “You know what, we’ve had evidence to show that this or that intervention or policy would make sense and would help to deliver the targets in a more effective way.”
Particularly in relation to questions such as what local authorities and national Government can do with regard to budgets and changes in legislation, how we create the environment for that modal shift, particularly in urban areas where we have that massive population and we can get those health benefits—not to exclude rural areas—do you think that specific things are missing from the plan in its draft stage? I invite you to come back in and perhaps identify a couple of things that you think are clearly missing, particularly in relation to the modal shift—unless you think that it is all here, but it is about emphasis.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
What role has travel planning had in those case studies? I am thinking, in particular, of large institutions and employers. Should national and/or local government co-ordinate, require or mandate travel planning? Would that be an effective route for delivering a multipronged approach to achieving modal shift in urban areas?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
I want to go back to the issue of stand-alone transport policy interventions. Concessionary travel has been a hugely successful policy for young people—it has really opened up opportunities and created a lot of socioeconomic benefit—but I am struck by the point that individual transport policy interventions on their own are less successful and need to be blended and integrated together.
I am interested in finding out how that works financially, because, when it comes to the climate change plan, there are questions about how much all of this will cost and how we can raise the revenue to effectively invest in supporting particular policy interventions such as concessionary travel. What is the evidence that demand management, congestion charging and other such policy interventions have resulted in investment in other positive interventions? In other words, people get something free but, in effect, it is not free, because the investment in it is being raised through congestion charging or demand management measures.
I guess the challenge is in ensuring that policy interventions that are positive and that result in people getting reductions in the cost of—or, indeed, free—travel are rolled out in advance of any demand management measures being put in place. That would mean that there would be a choice from day 1 to give people free and accessible travel instead of their having to wait five or 10 years for funds to be built up to enable an extra tram line to be built, say, or for another policy intervention to be implemented that levels the playing field.
Does that make sense? If so, I invite you to comment on that. I ask Rachel Aldred to answer first, and then the witnesses in the room.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 6 January 2026
Mark Ruskell
Is there a point at which, with the sector-specific road maps, there would be clarity as to what the carbon reduction is? You say that it is currently difficult to say what will happen and that, with the broad suite of policies, we might get somewhere towards achieving the envelope for waste in the climate change plan. However, is there a point in the next year or two at which you expect more detail on exactly what will be achieved?
11:45Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
I was waiting to hear what Kevin Anderson was going to say, but if we do not want to hear what he has to say, I will move on to the next question.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thank you. Jess, do you want to come in briefly?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
I understand, convener.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am struck by what Kevin Anderson said. There is very much a consensus between the UK Climate Change Committee and Governments across the UK on the need for a balanced pathway, and, from what we can see, the draft plan reflects the need for such a pathway. The issue is to do with the art of what is politically possible in the current context. Does the plan reflect the emergency that we are in? Obviously, we take the advice of the UKCCC, and we are following the middle path, but is that okay? Should we be sticking to the goal of reaching net zero by 2045? Does the plan reflect the urgency of what is required?
I turn first to James Curran.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
We will come to those sectors a little bit later.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 16 December 2025
Mark Ruskell
We will be talking about particular sectors a bit later on.