The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2374 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Okay. Haydn, will you comment on the economics of the exclusion of glass?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Yes. I read Scotland Against Spin’s response to the committee. I think that it was possibly the only group that actually submitted evidence. I recognise that there is a concern.
I wanted to ask for your view, cabinet secretary, on whether the good practice principles on community engagement are already being adhered to or whether you can point to examples of where developers are not engaging early on with communities, not doing a pre-application consultation, not holding exhibitions, and not gathering feedback on a development application and then offering feedback to those who have put in their views as to whether, as a result of those views, changes are being made or rejected. I am interested in the development process, how communities get involved very early on and how their views are respected.
Is the current voluntary system working, or are you coming across developers who are ignoring or bypassing it and saying, “It’s fine, we will just get through with very limited consultation”? Is good practice happening widely across the industry, or is that not happening, which is why you are bringing a mandatory requirement?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
I am struggling a bit with that. It might be better for you to write to the committee with some examples of where that applies and where it does not apply. What I am trying to understand is whether the Government is moving away from the EIA system to a new system of environmental outcomes reports. Is that what you are doing? I see that you are shaking your head.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
So, the environmental outcomes reports are more about those areas that are in the offshore environment, where Westminster is requiring that regime to be applied. You do not see EORs applying in relation to onshore development or anything that is within the consenting powers of the Scottish ministers.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
We need to get on with it. We cannot let the perfect be the enemy of the good, so now is the right time to push ahead with the scheme that is in front of us. It is very regrettable that the scheme does not include glass—we have gone through the impacts on the environment, on our communities, on climate change and on the economics of the scheme—but now is the time to move forward with what we have.
A solution has been found in operating on a three-nation basis, but I think that the Welsh Government is going down the right route. There will be a lot of learning as Wales looks to secure an exemption to the United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 and, I hope, successfully rolls out a scheme that includes glass. It will be bittersweet if Wales is successful in that and we realise that that could have been us back in 2023. Impossible conditions were put on the previous scheme. It could have gone ahead without glass a couple of years ago, but there were a lot of other conditions, which meant that we could not move forward at that point.
However, we are losing time. We are in a climate emergency. I see the impact of litter in our communities all the time. We are talking about really low-hanging fruit. Such a scheme is the simplest thing that the Parliament can do to tackle some of these issues. We should have got on with it years ago, but there is now an opportunity to pick up the reins again and move forward. I am pleased that there is now some movement on the issue, which is why I will be voting for the regulations.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
On that last point, I am struggling to see—given the breadth of different product categories and retailers and everybody who would be involved in this—how SEPA’s current capacity is adequate because, presumably, there will be a need for investigations. This is not just about issuing fixed-penalty notices. It is about the investigatory work.
I am thinking about the example of the single-use packaging regulations that have come in. I still see polystyrene containers being used by takeaways and other shops in my community. I do not think that that is allowed but, clearly, the fact that it is still happening suggests to me that there is already a gap in SEPA’s research and enforcement work, and this is an order of magnitude bigger than that. This is about all product categories, not just polystyrene takeaway containers. It covers a huge amount of product categories. I am struggling to understand how SEPA is going to enforce this with the capacity that it has at the moment, given that it already seems that it is not enforcing as much as it could.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
SEPA has said to you, “Yes, we will need an increase in capacity, but we do not need an increase in capacity beyond what we are going to get through the fees.”
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
It is a full cost recovery model.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Thanks.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Mark Ruskell
Do you think that there are isolated examples of bad practice that have tarred the industry with the same brush?