The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3573 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Yes, rather than a big-bang effect at the end.
I open the session to colleagues around the table.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That was the last item on our public agenda. We will go into private session after a break, to allow our witnesses and staff from broadcasting and the Official Report to leave.
11:16 Meeting continued in public until 11:40.Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
There are a lot more inquiries now than there were 20 or 30 years ago, but there is no reason that I can discern as to why that is the case. Ministers may be more likely to trigger inquiries than they were before, but we sometimes wonder why there was an inquiry into X when it would have been just as easy to have an inquiry into Y. The specific reasons why one inquiry happened when another did not can be rather obscure.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That is fine.
That is the question that I want to conclude on.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I think that there would have to be minimum criteria, which would not mean that an inquiry would have to be held; it would mean that any inquiry would have to meet a number of set criteria before being launched.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thirty pounds? They have just spent £3.6 million on a new door for the House of Lords.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
It might also be a different Government by that point.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Other witnesses have suggested something very similar, so there is probably a strong view that that is a fairly sensible approach.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I am delighted that you have both been able to come today to give evidence. It has been invaluable to our overall inquiry, which will continue after the summer recess.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You have largely hit the nail on the head as to why we are having our investigation, if you want to call it that. “Opaque” is a pretty good word to describe it, given a lot of the evidence that we have received so far.
Mr Campbell, you have taken a different tack on the same question. You have said:
“I see no merit in publishing individual remunerations ... Publication of overall accounts after the event would appear to be a necessary part of the process.”
Professor Sandy Cameron, who was the first witness to give evidence to the committee in our inquiry, said that there is a view that there appears to be no motivation and no incentive to keep an inquiry to time and to budget. If information on remuneration were to be published, would that help to focus minds a wee bit more?