Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 10 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 4689 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 3 February 2026

Kenneth Gibson

Thank you for that clarification.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 3 February 2026

Kenneth Gibson

Do you have an idea of what level of disincentive we are talking about?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 3 February 2026

Kenneth Gibson

Thank you very much for that.

No member has any comments on the Scottish Landfill Tax (Administration) Amendment Regulations 2026, and no member has recommended annulment. Therefore, do members agree not to make any further recommendations in relation to the instrument?

Members indicated agreement.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Kenneth Gibson

You are saying that the figure is effectively going from £634.9 million to £926 million. Is that correct?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Kenneth Gibson

It looks as though the housing sector is getting a major boost. We know that, over the next five years, there will be a real-terms reduction in capital and a gross domestic product deflator of around 5 per cent in real terms. Where is that blow going to fall?

I will not go into the infrastructure delivery pipeline in great detail because we will take evidence on it separately, but can you say where there are likely to be significant reductions in capital spend? We asked for that in relation to that pipeline 25 months ago and I feel somewhat underwhelmed by the fact that the pipeline talks about the projects and the money that has been spent but it does not give details of timelines or the resources allocated against the projects that are in annex A and annex B.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Kenneth Gibson

One of the projects in that tranche is in my constituency. It was put forward in 2004 and, 22 years later, it still has not moved to annex A. How long is that going to take? I know that it is a living document but it is not very inspiring when you look at the timescales—it seems to me that there is a “mañana” approach. Where is the sense of urgency about pinning some of those things down?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Kenneth Gibson

As I said last week, I think that the real-terms reduction is going to be deeper because I do not think that the GDP deflator is accurate.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Kenneth Gibson

It is commendable that the Government is increasing funding for critical safety, maintenance and infrastructure on the roads by 6.1 per cent compared with the ABR figure, and funding for ferries by 18 per cent.

However, in the past two years, I have raised the issue of why public-private partnership infrastructure investment appears in the transport section of the budget every year, but not anywhere else. I understood that that was going to be resolved one way or the other so that we could compare spending in different portfolios.

According to the outturn figure, there has been a 42.6 per cent increase in spend on PPP infrastructure investment in transport. Why would that be?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Kenneth Gibson

It seems as though the payments are being stepped up. Even compared with the ABR figure, we are talking about an increase of around 10 per cent. Why is the PPP expenditure in other portfolio areas not in the budget, as we have asked for it to be for at least the past two years?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Budget Scrutiny 2026-27

Meeting date: 27 January 2026

Kenneth Gibson

It makes life easier for you if we can ask a question and get an answer because, that way, we do not end up having to keep asking the same questions year after year. I would have thought that that would make life easier for the Government.

There has been a massive improvement in the layout of the budget with regard to the autumn budget revision figures, but witnesses at last week’s meeting, including those from the Scottish Fiscal Commission, expressed frustration about the fact that there is still £606 million that is not set against the ABR. That means that, to an extent, we are in a situation in which we are comparing apples with oranges.

One area in which real concern has been raised is that of local government funding. The Government has made it clear that one of its aims is to tackle the cost of living crisis, but it will not be easy to tackle the cost of living crisis if people get above-inflation council tax rises. I would have thought that that is almost a certainty, given the settlement for local government. I think that the settlements in some areas are pretty robust—most of them seem to be above inflation—but that is not the case with the local government settlement.

The Convention of Scottish Local Authorities has provided a briefing to all members of the committee, which states:

“this is a very poor settlement which fails to address the dire financial situation of Local Government in Scotland. The 2026-27 Budget provided a small amount of additional, uncommitted revenue funding of £235m and an uplift to the Affordable Housing Supply Programme.”

As we have discussed, the affordable housing supply programme is getting a major boost, but there is a real issue when it comes to day-to-day spend.

The briefing goes on to say:

“In addition to the gap Councils face, the £497.5m gap in 2025-26 in Health and Social Care Partnerships will continue to rise as demand and complexity increases. The additional funding is only 30% of what we demanded for social care alone.”

Why is local government the poor relation in what is, in many ways, a good budget?