The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4060 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Kenneth Gibson
We will continue with our evidence taking on effective Scottish Government decision making. I am delighted to welcome to the meeting Paul Sheerin, chief executive officer, and Rebecca Rigg, commercial director, at Scottish Engineering; and Sandy Begbie CBE, chief executive officer at Scottish Financial Enterprise.
As members may recall, this evidence session is intended to focus not only on the witnesses’ experience of Scottish Government decision making, but also provide an opportunity to explore how their sectors approach effective decision making.
With that in mind, we will move straight to questions and I will begin by asking Paul Sheerin, how do you approach effective decision making?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Kenneth Gibson
Yes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Kenneth Gibson
I thank our witnesses for coming along. The session has been very helpful and has given us another dimension to the inquiry that we are undertaking. We will continue to take evidence on effective Scottish Government decision making at future meetings.
That concludes the public part of the meeting. Our next agenda item is a discussion in private on our work programme.
12:07 Meeting continued in private until 12:14.Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Kenneth Gibson
One of the things that were mentioned by former senior civil servants to whom we spoke was that they were of the view that there should be a separation between policy development and implementation. Incidentally, that view was not shared by former ministers, which is quite interesting. Where do you think that kind of boundary should lie?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 25 April 2023
Kenneth Gibson
I will move on to my colleagues round the table.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Kenneth Gibson
I will have to suspend the session as we have lost the connection. I apologise, John.
10:07 Meeting suspended.10:11 On resuming—
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Kenneth Gibson
I am sorry, Diane. You were cut off in mid-flow.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Kenneth Gibson
Okay. John Mason, can you remind us what you were asking about?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Kenneth Gibson
In your presentation, you touched on the long-term insights briefing, which you said is produced at least once every three years. One of the key points of that is that the public can contribute to future decision making, helping the country to collectively think about and plan for the future. I realise that the act was only passed in 2020, and we have had the pandemic since then, but is there any evidence or are there any signs that that has transpired or is starting to happen?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 18 April 2023
Kenneth Gibson
I will ask only one more question, then I will open out the session to colleagues round the table. On Sunday, a book called “How Westminster Works ... and Why It Doesn’t” by a man called Ian Dunt was reviewed in The Sunday Times. It was interesting that the review talked about a technique that the civil service at Westminster has called boxing-in. That is a situation in which, allegedly, civil servants give ministers four or five options, all but one of which are completely bonkers, and one of which is sensible, in order to try and channel the minister into taking a particular decision. The article pointed out that Liz Truss broke that technique when she was Prime Minister by always going for one of the mad options. Generally speaking, it is a serious issue, because it means that ministers are corralled in certain directions. Does that take place in New Zealand? Do you have experience of that?