The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3573 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That has exhausted questions from the committee. I have only a couple more. The first is about Anne’s law, which you touched on. You said:
“It is expected that there will be some costs for care home providers and those supporting care homes, to promote and champion Anne’s Law through staff and provider awareness sessions, formal training, updating visiting policies including the identification of the Essential Care Supporter and for printing leaflets and other administration.”
You then went on to say those would be
“absorbed within the usual costs of following current guidance around named visitor policy”
and so on. Surely, if there are additional responsibilities and training, additional costs will be involved.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Indeed, but, as Mr Mason pointed out to the previous panel, every document has to be looked at. We are trying to conduct this investigation, if you want to call it that, in a matter of weeks as well as doing all the other things that we have to do as MSPs and so on. One issue that the committee is considering is that time does not seem to be much of a factor in these inquiries. Lord Hardie talked about an inquiry that he chaired that lasted nine years, for example. The Scottish Covid-19 inquiry, which you are involved in, Mr Pugh, has already taken three and a half years, and the UK inquiry has taken four years. More than £200 million has been spent in total, with no end in sight. The Australian Covid-19 inquiry lasted a year and cost £4 million. Was what was delivered any less impactful for the people who had concerns about what happened to their loved ones?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
What kind of oversight is there of fees? Do people just put in an invoice? Who checks that the invoice is correct, for example?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Ms Dunlop, since 2019,
“the Cabinet Office has run an Inquiries Unit, whose remit is for the whole of the UK, including Scotland, to help share best practice. ”
How has that impacted the sharing of best practice among on-going public inquiries?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Before I open the discussion to colleagues around the table, I have one final question for you, Mr Pugh. The actions of Government departments, public bodies and others who engage with a public inquiry play a significant role and can contribute significantly to rising costs and extended timelines, which undermines inquiries’ effectiveness and public confidence. In the inquiries that you have been involved in, have you experienced that at all?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
That has exhausted questions from committee members, but I have a brief question for each of you on areas that we have not touched on. The first is for you, Mr Pugh.
Interestingly, the Scottish Parliament information centre briefing that committee members received states that 45 per cent of an inquiry’s time is spent on producing the report. Is there any way in which that process could be expedited?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
My second question is for you, Ms Dunlop. Should Government departments and public bodies be required to respond formally to recommendations within a set timeframe?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
What might be a reasonable timeframe in which to respond to a report?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
But does that sound to you like a conflict of interest?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 27 May 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Our next agenda item is the second evidence session in our inquiry into the cost-effectiveness of Scottish public inquiries.? I welcome to the meeting the Rt Hon Lord Hardie, who is the former chair of the Edinburgh tram inquiry, and Dr Emma Ireton, associate professor at Nottingham law school, Nottingham Trent University.
We will move straight to questions, because there is so much to dig into. Lord Hardie, you said that public inquiries often reinvent the wheel. Will you say a wee bit about your concerns in that regard?