The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3539 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Kenneth Gibson
Okay. In evidence to the committee, Dr Brewer of the Resolution Foundation said that UK Government cuts of £185 million to Scotland’s capital allocation were not “a sensible action”. He added:
“We are pointing the finger of blame principally at the UK Government”.—[Official Report, Finance and Public Administration Committee, 20 December 2022; c 6.]
He had said previously that the decision not to enhance capital funding, given the high levels of inflation,
“will lead to a steep decline in the purchasing power of Scottish Government investments ... this may hamper the Scottish Government’s ability to meet its net zero targets and damage the economic recovery”.
To what extent is that the case? How is the Scottish Government trying to mitigate the damage?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Kenneth Gibson
Obviously, if there are significant increases, the money would, understandably, have to be found from elsewhere.
Colleagues will be glad to know that I have only a couple of questions more, and then I will open out the session. I am not going to ask all the juicy questions, but I want to ask about one important issue that has gone back and forth.
In evidence to the committee, Professor Roy of the Scottish Fiscal Commission said, in talking about higher rate and additional taxes:
“the Government has to be careful when it thinks about how much additional revenue might come in, just because of people’s potential behavioural responses.”
He added that, although on paper the extra penny on the additional rate would bring in a further £30 million of taxation,
“that is without behavioural change”,
and he went on to say:
“When you add in the behavioural change, we think that the totality of that is only £3 million.”—[Official Report, Finance and Public Administration Committee, 20 December 2022; c 30, 38.]
Other organisations and groups might have different views on that, but that is what the Scottish Fiscal Commission is basically saying.
Is it worth the bother of adding an extra penny on tax if 90 per cent will be lost to behavioural change? How concerned are you that the level of behavioural change restricts your room to manoeuvre and that, if tax went up further, you might end up with a negative tax-raising situation?
While I am on taxation, I will ask more about that. Is the Scottish Government worried about an increase in people incorporating to avoid paying taxes? Is it worried about the image that is presented to other parts of the UK—wrongly, in my view—that Scotland is a high-tax country?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Kenneth Gibson
There is, of course, an argument for additional taxation that is being made by some people. The difficulty is that that does not seem to take behavioural change into account at all. People seem to think that, if tax is increased by X amount, the revenue to the Scottish Government will indeed be X although , in fact, that is not the case.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Kenneth Gibson
Point taken.
Finally from me, when we debate the budget in the chamber, we will no doubt have the usual demands for vast increases in expenditure across every portfolio accompanied either by tax cuts or—who knows?—possibly tax rises. In the 26 days since your budget statement, which political parties have approached you asking to meet to discuss alternative proposals? Of those that do, will you insist that demands for increased spending in one area of the budget are met by identified reductions elsewhere or by specific tax rises in order to meet them, to ensure a balanced budget?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Kenneth Gibson
I just wanted to know if you had been approached by them. I would not expect them to turn up at your house on new year’s day to first foot you.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Kenneth Gibson
I am just trying to put it into context with where the rest of the Scottish consolidated fund is going to be spent. Not many areas are going to get the level of increase that each one of the office-holders has done.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Kenneth Gibson
I do not want to spend a lot of time on this, but £242,000 is the increase for the SCHR. You mentioned two additional members of staff, but surely there must be more to it than that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Kenneth Gibson
What developments do you envisage from that in terms of enhanced public engagement?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Kenneth Gibson
And the good news is: no new website on the way.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 10 January 2023
Kenneth Gibson
If you had not done that, there would have been very severe impacts on the budget.