The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3539 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you. That concludes the committee’s questions.
Item 2 is formal consideration of the motion on the instrument. I invite the minister to move motion S6M-09584.
Motion moved,
That the Finance and Public Administration Committee recommends that the Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (Green Freeports Relief) (Scotland) Order 2023 [draft] be approved.—[Tom Arthur]
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
I thank the minister and his colleagues for their evidence. We will publish in due course a short report to the Parliament setting out our decision on the draft order.
I suspend the meeting briefly to allow for a change of witnesses.
10:48 Meeting suspended.Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
You say in paragraph 26 in annex A of the report:
“The variation in tax revenue generated by the highest earners is likely to continue to be a source of significant uncertainty and forecast error, with very limited data available on this group. In the future, HMRC’s MTD project may improve the situation.”
You then say:
“To continue to improve our forecasts, we will focus on better understanding what determines changes in tax revenues of the highest earners.”
That brings us back to page 3, where you mention “points for improvement”. I take it that that is one of the areas that you are talking about in that respect. What specifically will you be able to do, given the paucity of data with which to improve forecasting in this volatile area?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
Business might move but, with less than 4 per cent unemployment in Scotland, why would workers move to an area if their wages were to go lower? Would they not just get a job somewhere else? Surely, 75,000 people will not move into those zones to get lower wages. It is not really credible that people will move to accept lower wages in an economy where there already are chronic labour and skills shortages, is it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
That assumes 100 per cent displacement, however, and I thought that the whole point of the green ports was to create new, additional jobs.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
A quick wee calculation off the top of my head tells me that, if there are 18,000 top-rate taxpayers, they each pay an average of just under £140,000 a year. That is a very interesting section of the tax-paying public indeed.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
I think that about 12,000 more people are employed in the sector. However, the productivity outcome is not something that we looked at when we were doing post-legislative scrutiny in this area a year or so ago.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
That concludes questions from the committee. I have one further question, which is about David Bell’s paper. John Mason touched on it, so I thought that I should do likewise.
In the exchange, we discussed the issue of potential spending changes and tax changes that will be necessary—not the specifics, but the fact that they might be necessary. Professor Bell talks about loss aversion, which is something that I have raised before in the committee. That is the issue whereby people, if you give them additional funding for whatever, simply shrug their shoulders and say, “Thanks”, but if you take something away, they are extremely hostile to that, and it causes much more of a political backlash than the gain that you would get from doing something to give them the same financial sum.
What implications does that have for long-term fiscal sustainability and the ability of Governments to take decisions that may require to be taken?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
I wanted to end on that because fiscal sustainability is going to be the key issue in our budget scrutiny this year.
I thank you very much for your evidence today, Professor Roy and Professor Breedon, and I also thank Claire Murdoch. It is very much appreciated, as always.
It has been a reasonably long session so far, so I call a break until 11 o’clock.
10:51 Meeting suspended.Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 5 September 2023
Kenneth Gibson
Derek, you talk in your submission about some 75,000 jobs. I have to be honest and say that the numbers seem quite fantastical to me. What are your concerns regarding displacement? When previous Governments have introduced enterprise zones, there have been concerns that they have simply moved jobs from one part of the country to another part. Obviously, that is particularly acute in areas that border such zones, including, in this case, green freeports.