The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3510 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Yes, I was impressed that your report on NHS Highland came in for less than £150,000, and it seems to have been successful.
In your responses to our call for views, you gave quite a substantive response on culture, talking about
“a likely consequence of a culture”
in which the people who want the inquiry want
“to look back to find fault or allocate blame ... rather than to look forward and to learn lessons about what worked ... and how things could be done differently or better in the future.”
In the past 24 hours, we have seen the news from south of the border about grooming and a specific inquiry. In Scotland, there is a clamour for another public inquiry to be held into reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete that makes it clear that they want a statutory, or judge-led, inquiry, which will take a considerable period of time, I imagine. Is there any way that we can turn the Titanic away from the iceberg and persuade the public, for example, or, indeed, ministers who instruct public inquiries that, although there will always be a role for public inquiries, there is a better or different way forward?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Exactly. We do not have years to rumble on; we get four or six-minute speeches.
I have one further question. We have seen a plethora of public inquiries, with the number increasing. The issue is not just time and cost but the overall number. Should the bar for the establishment of a public inquiry be raised? The press and individual organisations may be clamouring for inquiries, but should there be set criteria to meet before a public inquiry can be triggered, rather than a decision being made by a minister when the fourth estate and others call for it?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
People want a Ferrari rather than a Ford, if you know what I mean.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thirty pounds? They have just spent £3.6 million on a new door for the House of Lords.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
It might also be a different Government by that point.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Other witnesses have suggested something very similar, so there is probably a strong view that that is a fairly sensible approach.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
I am delighted that you have both been able to come today to give evidence. It has been invaluable to our overall inquiry, which will continue after the summer recess.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You have largely hit the nail on the head as to why we are having our investigation, if you want to call it that. “Opaque” is a pretty good word to describe it, given a lot of the evidence that we have received so far.
Mr Campbell, you have taken a different tack on the same question. You have said:
“I see no merit in publishing individual remunerations ... Publication of overall accounts after the event would appear to be a necessary part of the process.”
Professor Sandy Cameron, who was the first witness to give evidence to the committee in our inquiry, said that there is a view that there appears to be no motivation and no incentive to keep an inquiry to time and to budget. If information on remuneration were to be published, would that help to focus minds a wee bit more?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Okay, but I suppose that the Scottish Government could say that it practices inward transparency. To be perfectly honest, I think that if ministers said that in the chamber, there would be a howl from Opposition parties—and probably from members of the governing party, too, including me.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 17 June 2025
Kenneth Gibson
You have said that cross-examination can take time but almost always yields results, but you are also saying that it does not have to be used in every circumstance and, on occasion, can be like wielding a sledgehammer to crack a nut.