The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 3978 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Okay—I stand corrected if that is the case, although my understanding was that it was because of the inquiry that the police made their decision. Even if that is the case, however, the amount should be in the public domain, should it not? Is it going to be in the public domain?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Okay. In terms of responding to inquiries, one issue is that, sometimes, after it has taken many years for an inquiry to come up with recommendations, months—if not years—elapse without them being implemented. I see that you are smiling at that.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
The total cost of the Sheku Bayoh inquiry is £51 million if you include both sides, because there are two sides to the issue—that is what we are looking at.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
As I pointed out earlier, and as John Mason mentioned, there are significantly more UK inquiries, and the UK Government has spent about £1.5 billion.
We have not really touched on terms of reference. I think that we have to be clear and robust in setting terms of reference. We can look at the Piper Alpha and Dunblane shooting inquiries, for example. Those incidents were very traumatic for all those who lived through them and remember the details, and 167 men died on Piper Alpha and 16 children and a teacher died in Dunblane, and yet those were very short, succinct and straightforward inquiries that cost a fraction of the inquiries that we are talking about. I think that Lord Cullen’s inquiry into Piper Alpha cost under £2 million and lasted for just over a year.
As Professor Cameron stated in written evidence,
“It has to be recognised that inquiries are a source of substantial income for some large legal firms and as such the question arises as to the extent to which they are motivated to keep costs to a minimum and within budget.”
We have seen almost an explosion of legal costs. Do you find it inappropriate that some legal firms have people going on television demanding the establishment or extension of inquiries when they themselves have a direct pecuniary interest?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
In her written evidence, Dr Ireton, who specialises in this area, said:
“there has been remarkably little evidence-based work commissioned on what inquiries cost, how they manage those costs, and how spending compares against original budgets.”
She also said that they are
“often ... concluded with minimal formal evaluation or system-wide learning.”
Is the Scottish Government going to alter that as we move forward?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
We will make recommendations in our report, but it will be up to the Government to act on those.
We talked about public inquiries, with their interim reports, making changes as they go along. I would hope that the Government, seeing where we are coming from, would already be looking to make some changes.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
To be honest, I do not think that you have been defensive at all.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
They do it out of the goodness of their hearts—they do not get paid vast amounts of money, no? [Laughter.]
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Deputy First Minister, I thank you and your officials for your contributions. Do you wish to make any further comments at this point?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 November 2025
Kenneth Gibson
Thank you very much. That was helpful and it generated quite a lot of questions that I want to ask. I am not going to ask all the questions that I want to ask, because I know that my colleagues are quite keen, and I do not want to tread on their toes, but I might come in after them, as well as before them.
I want to start with the guidance for public inquiries. I understand that it was laid in August 2024, but, despite having started an inquiry a couple of months before being informed of its existence on 30 May, the committee was then advised that the guidance would not be ready until October, and it has only just been published. Why has it taken 14 months to publish that guidance?