Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Session 6: 13 May 2021 to 8 April 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 4778 contributions

|

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 3 March 2026

Kenneth Gibson

That is only right if you accept that procurement costs are reasonable. I do not think they are reasonable, because—

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 3 March 2026

Kenneth Gibson

I will come back to one or two of those things, but first it is important that Ian Hughes has an opportunity to say a few things. Ian, we can talk about building this or that, but without the workforce we cannot really build anything. The role of the Construction Industry Training Board and, indeed, the whole sector in producing a skilled workforce is absolutely critical. In your submission, you said:

“In 2024/25 over 6,500 people started a Construction related Modern Apprenticeship, more than a quarter of all new starts. Over 13,000 apprentices were in training, and the industry achieved a 78% completion rate.”

That is all very positive news. Scotland is experiencing a record-low birth rate, which will feed through to the workforce soon. Are you confident that we will be able to provide the number of people to the construction sector—either young people or folk who are a bit older who are switching careers—to enable it to have a workforce with the range of skills that are required in the years ahead?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 3 March 2026

Kenneth Gibson

If it is erratic.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 3 March 2026

Kenneth Gibson

I would consider them all to be infrastructure, to be honest. Maintenance is a really important issue, as is house building, and record investment is going in there. What you are doing in construction is also vital—they are all vital, obviously.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 3 March 2026

Kenneth Gibson

We have a good roofer fae Cumnock.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 3 March 2026

Kenneth Gibson

Thank you for that—it is very helpful.

Peter, you are not a big fan of the mutual investment model, are you? In 2019, the Scottish Futures Trust, in its options appraisal paper, found that the mutual investment model was significantly more expensive, at

“2.6 to 3.3 times the construction cost over the 25 years of the asset.”

I know that that model has been rejected for the A9. The SFT said that

“This compares with 1.9 to 2.6 times the construction cost if financed using public borrowing”,

and noted that an

“asset funded using capital grant, and … maintained to the same standard over 25 years is estimated to be 1.5 times the construction cost.”

Would you reject the mutual investment model, or are there any specific circumstances in which you feel that it is the only game in town? To be honest, for me, there are shades of public-private partnerships and private finance initiatives.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 3 March 2026

Kenneth Gibson

Is it most of them, or is it a teensy-weensy number? We do not want a situation whereby it is almost accepted that projects will overrun and be over budget. If something has a budget and a delivery date, it should be completed by that date. I remember that some projects in the private sector, at least—and, I imagine, in the public sector, although I am not an expert on procurement—would have penalty clauses if they were not delivered on time.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Infrastructure Delivery Pipeline 2026

Meeting date: 3 March 2026

Kenneth Gibson

Ian?

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Fiscal Commission (Fiscal Sustainability)

Meeting date: 3 March 2026

Kenneth Gibson

I want a eulogy in case I do not come back. Unlike those folk, I have to go in front of the voters, along with Michael Marra and Patrick Harvie.

Anyway, thank you very much for that opening statement. It is actually very helpful. There are a number of issues that you did not touch on; for obvious reasons, I will probably move to those first. For example, in paragraph 1.23 in your report, you said in reference to the thresholds at which tax is paid that

“the divergence in the thresholds has led to the number of higher rate taxpayers in Scotland becoming larger, and rising faster than in the rest of the UK.”

You go on to talk about how, just a few short years ago, people working in the Scottish public sector were paid, on average, £400 a year more than people in the public sector down south. They are now paid £1,500 more, on average. Is that having an impact in terms of the number of people who are moving into the higher bands? They are getting paid more, but are they moving into a higher rate of tax at the same time.

Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]

Scottish Spending Review

Meeting date: 24 February 2026

Kenneth Gibson

That takes us on to issues such as widening the tax base and where we set taxes. If we had had economic growth at the level that we had before the financial crash, we would all be significantly better off. I think that all the studies have shown that: incredibly, we might have been up to 30 per cent better off per capita, simply as a result of having an extra 1 or 2 per cent of economic growth over that 17 or 18-year period.