The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4689 contributions
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
We are looking at the Scottish spending review, which involves large sums of public money, so we want people to be very straightforward about exactly what they think. If you think that IJBs are the greatest thing since sliced bread, please tell us; if you think that they are the work of Satan, tell us that. I imagine that your view will be somewhere between those two extremes, but we are keen to hear it.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
You said that there are opportunities for improvement. Will you give some examples of those?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
That is why the IJBs were established.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Capital funding is scheduled to reduce over the next five years. It is going to be the same in 2029-30 as it was in 2023-24 in real terms. Of course, that is only if you accept the gross domestic product deflator, which I think is a poor measure of capital.
I was going to save this issue for next week’s meeting, but I will mention it now, given what you have just said. The Scottish Futures Trust has talked about innovative funding mechanisms, such as road pricing and congestion charging. Motorists already pay 63.54p per litre in fuel duty, plus VAT, and they also pay VAT on whatever else is charged on a litre, so the total VAT probably comes to 70p to 85p a litre. They also pay road tax. Are those innovative charges realistic and deliverable? How popular would they be? I think that we know the answer to that second question.
What other mechanisms could be used to bring in additional capital for things such as routine road maintenance? We have all driven along some of the horrific roads that are an issue across the entire UK. It is a big problem, and Governments have tackled it in a half-hearted way. The UK Government has put significant money into the issue, but it appears that the money is being used for things other than what it is supposed to be used for.
Would you like to see, for example, as part of the annual capital allocation, a ring-fenced fund for tackling potholes, over and above the normal local government capital allocation, and for that to be distributed in line with the normal distribution formula?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
You just want a big capital allocation.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
If anyone wants to answer that, please let me know. In the meantime, I will ask a question of Tiffany Ritchie. When it comes to asset disposals, colleges will be permitted to retain 70 per cent of their sales proceeds of more than £1 million. Why is it 70 per cent and not 60, 80 or 100 per cent? What is the rationale behind that figure?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
In your submission, you said:
“To secure efficiencies across the sectors we fund, we provide funding for the delivery of procurement services and digital infrastructure at a national level through Advanced Procurement for Universities and Colleges”,
as a result of which you said that significant savings have been made. Can you talk about how that is working, how it has managed to save resource and the amount of capital that you are able to deploy?
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Yes—you say that, through Jisc and APUC, savings of £27 million and £37.2 million, respectively, are made.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
Is the Scottish spending review helping you to enable that work by, for example, allowing colleges and universities to enter into contracts over a longer period of time, or is it completely superfluous in that regard? We are looking at how impactful and helpful the Scottish spending review is, and how it could be improved.
Finance and Public Administration Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 February 2026
Kenneth Gibson
That takes us on to issues such as widening the tax base and where we set taxes. If we had had economic growth at the level that we had before the financial crash, we would all be significantly better off. I think that all the studies have shown that: incredibly, we might have been up to 30 per cent better off per capita, simply as a result of having an extra 1 or 2 per cent of economic growth over that 17 or 18-year period.