The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4938 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
John Swinney
That is not quite what I am asking. Is everyone on board?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
John Swinney
I will follow up on the point that Russell Findlay just advanced in relation to the adequacy of the immediate SPS review—I will call it the immediate review—and the immediate health service review of a death in custody. I understand that by statute there is a requirement for a fatal accident inquiry to be undertaken when somebody dies in legal custody. From the perspective of addressing the needs of the families, which you have powerfully put to us this morning, could those processes—I am not sure whether you are familiar with the content of those processes—provide sufficient information in advance of a fatal accident inquiry to, in essence, avoid the need for a fourth process to be added to the system?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
John Swinney
I understand; thank you very much.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
John Swinney
Good morning. I would like to follow on from where Pauline McNeill left off and ask about the interaction between the proposed investigation that would take place and a fatal accident inquiry. Has any thought been given to whether it is possible to have the type of comprehensive independent investigation that has been proposed—I completely understand the rationale for it—while a fatal accident inquiry is pending? We often rub up against the necessity of leaving things until the statutory process that, as you quite correctly say, has to take place in relation to a death in custody has taken place. Has there been any interaction between the group and the Crown on the sequencing of all this?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
John Swinney
Thank you for that. I was struck by your remark that you were cautious about relying on the data about, to summarise what you said, 50 per cent of deaths in custody arising from what one might describe as illness or natural causes. I understand your point about being cautious about that data, because it opens up a discussion about the extent to which being incarcerated exacerbates the decline in individuals’ health and, therefore, what society must do to address that point. Am I correctly understanding the substance behind the point that you make in that observation?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 20 September 2023
John Swinney
I want to move on to the composition of the deaths in prison custody action group. Do you think that everyone is rowing in the same direction?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
John Swinney
I will follow up on that point. I assume that you have seen the submission that the committee received from the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents. The fourth paragraph on page 3 says that
“The Scottish Government do have clear Strategic Objectives, but the public services are not sufficiently linked in at the tactical and operational levels.”
I am interested in that point, because it throws up the challenges that police officers experience because of the wider social questions that they face. I appreciate and have seen at first hand some of those challenges, having spent time with your officers in my constituency. However, when I saw the point that was made by the Association of Scottish Police Superintendents, it struck me that it is an area that is in need of further development. What is Police Scotland doing to drive the degree of connection that will be essential in ensuring that vulnerable members of the public can be supported through integrated services that stretch beyond what Police Scotland can do? How is Police Scotland enabling that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
John Swinney
Okay. Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
John Swinney
That involves providing the necessary challenge to ensure that, from the public-interest point of view, policing approaches are commensurate with having exhausted every avenue for efficiency and effectiveness.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 13 September 2023
John Swinney
This will use up my slot, convener, because it is on exactly the same territory.
I do not want, in any way, to give off any non-encouraging tones here, but I am interested in why this has not happened before. I really welcome what is going on here, so please do not take anything discouraging from what I say. However, the COPFS submission, on page 19 of our briefing, states:
“This has been achieved without any additional funding or the need for legislation.”
Mr McQueen said that, in the pilot, there is now proper case management by sheriffs.
When I think about all that the criminal justice system wrestles with—the backlogs, the frustration around witness citations and the time that it takes for cases to be handled—it begs the question why this has not been done before and what else could be going on.