The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 4938 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
John Swinney
Thank you for that. That opens up two issues that I would like to explore. The first is the issue that you and Hannah McLaughlan have aired about what trauma-informed practice looks like in reality in the court setting. I would like you to explain, from your experience, your expectations for the future if trauma-informed practice is to be a requirement in court proceedings. Where do you believe the greatest amount of movement is needed in that respect to ensure that, in the future, victims will be in a trauma-informed environment?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
John Swinney
Good morning and thank you for being here today. I want to follow up on one of your comments, Ellie. You described the court environment as intimidating. Would you describe it as respectful to you?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
John Swinney
That is perhaps the key point. We all accept that none of that is pleasant, but I put the same point to you as I put to the previous panel: did you feel respected during the process?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
John Swinney
From your respective perspectives, tell me a little about what, in your case, Sarah, was good about that engagement and what in yours, Hannah, was deficient.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
John Swinney
Did any elements of your experience with the system work well or effectively, Hannah, at any stage of the process?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 17 January 2024
John Swinney
Forgive me for interrupting, but the bill says that the role of the commissioner is to “monitor compliance” with standards, “promote best practice” in relation to trauma-informed practice and “undertake and commission research”. The commissioner will not, under the existing proposal, have the power to put his or her foot down and say, “This is not acceptable.” That power is somewhere else, but over there, everyone is kicking off and saying, “Oh my goodness, we have far too much interference in this wholly ineffective system of legal services regulation that we have in Scotland.”
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Swinney
Are there any limitations on the sources of information for that process that the Scottish Prison Service pursues to ensure that it has the broadest possible perspective on the history of an individual and the risk that they might pose to any other prisoner or member of staff in the Scottish Prison Service?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Swinney
I would like to follow up on the point that Russell Findlay has been raising with Teresa Medhurst in relation to the discretion that is provided for governors to opt for a search to be undertaken by an officer of the individual’s original gender. I wonder whether Teresa Medhurst could put on the record the approach that she envisages that a governor would take in fulfilling the statutory obligation in the instruments that the committee is considering this afternoon, particularly in the scenario that Mr Findlay put, where an officer has concerns about what they are being asked to do.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Swinney
Would you say that what is in front of the committee today is a strengthening of the obligation on governors to ensure that the perspectives and concerns of members of staff are addressed to a greater extent, with greater obligation, than was the case before?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 January 2024
John Swinney
Thank you for that. Would you accept that the instrument on the prison rules that the committee is looking at this afternoon places an obligation on the governor to ensure that, in their institution, there is an appropriate opportunity for a member of staff to raise their concerns and have them properly and fully addressed? Would you accept that that is required of the governor as a consequence of them being allocated the discretionary power in question?
13:30