The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 529 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Sarah Boyack
Kevin Lindsay, do you want to come in? I presume that there is an opportunity to have such a plan, now that ScotRail is run by the Government.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Sarah Boyack
I have a quick follow-up question on the cost issue. If you get more passengers on trains, I presume that the benefits include being able to plan ahead with a different number of rail carriages. For example, we know that getting on the last train from Fife to Edinburgh can be a nightmare, but if the provision is better planned, is that not good for the system? If the trains carried more passengers, compared with buses, that might mean that there would be fewer cars on the roads, so the buses would be more efficient, too. Is there a trade-off or a crossover here?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Sarah Boyack
Thank you. I, too, declare that I am a member of Unison.
I have a question that follows on from our discussion with the first panel. Although there has been a bounce-back since the pandemic, bus and rail passenger numbers are lower than they were before Covid. Those stats are quite stark. The previous panel had a lot to say about what puts people off using trains and buses. What can we do to attract more people to use trains and buses?
I am open about who goes first. Perhaps Gordon Martin could kick off the answers.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Sarah Boyack
Where would you start in terms of priority? Is it about the regional transport partnerships working with community groups and local authorities and, on the islands, getting people to talk to CalMac—all those kinds of things?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Sarah Boyack
I think that you will soon be able to use an integrated tram and bus ticket in the Lothians. That is coming soon, because they are prioritising it. Doing that and making it work right across the country is really important.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Sarah Boyack
Thank you. That was really helpful.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Sarah Boyack
I want to invite some more feedback on that. The previous witnesses were quite relaxed about different models of delivery. However, this year, the bus infrastructure fund is worth only £10 million. What would your priority for expenditure be, so that we can deliver the new services that are needed by people who use buses, which are simply not available? How would you get that process going again?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Sarah Boyack
I am thinking about the impact on the choices that people have. We have 18 million fewer trips because there are reduced services, and 20 million fewer trips because of increased journey times due to congestion. There is a question about how we can actually make the buses available for people.
I was looking at the statistics. The bus partnership fund was meant to be £500 million, but only £20 million has been allocated to date, and nothing was allocated for last year. The community bus fund, which is allocated to local authorities and regional transport partnerships, is only £7 million. Is there an issue about how we support an increase in the provision of buses rather than allowing there to be a reduction in the first place?
There is an issue of inequality, in that people who do not have cars do not have a choice, so buses are absolutely critical in terms of equality. There is also an issue about how to persuade people not to use cars.
Robert Samson, what do you think our priority should be with regard to ensuring that we do not lose bus services in the first place?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Sarah Boyack
I very much agree with you. It feels very odd that there were so few consultation responses and that one of them was not considered. It would also have been helpful to have a bit of a note on how the regulations impact on people’s daily lives and on the sectors where they will be implemented. However, I do not object to the instrument.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Sarah Boyack
Where should investment in those routes be prioritised to make them more reliable?