The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 662 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
I will reflect on that last comment by Jonnie Hall. If organisations—businesses, farmers or whatever—are complying with legislation, such as planning law or the conditions of a permit, why would they be liable, rather than the Government or the regulator, if that is the responsibility in terms of ecocide?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
And that is good.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
That is helpful. Does anyone else want to come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
How would you amend the bill?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
We have just been talking about organisations and individuals. What happens if it is actually an individual who has committed the alleged crime? Would it be appropriate to prosecute an individual—for example, a member of the public who, by their actions, creates a wildfire that goes on for more than a week and has massive consequences? We have experienced that situation quite recently. Would it be legitimate, under the bill, to prosecute somebody if that was reckless behaviour?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
Thank you—that answer was swift.
What about the other witnesses? Do I see nodding heads, or do you disagree?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
If somebody is actually committing ecocide—if that is the allegation—but if they are in compliance with the Government’s regulations, would that be lifted up to the Government to be responsible?
I could leave that question on the table.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 23 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
Well, think about accountability, and about raising the bar and expectations.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
Thanks. Would any other of our witnesses like to come in on that issue?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 9 September 2025
Sarah Boyack
Thanks very much. We have had a lot of really good recommendations in those answers, which the committee will need to build into its own recommendations. Back to you, convener.