The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 622 contributions
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 April 2022
Rhoda Grant
Will you look into that in the future, given that it is about public spending and the cost to the public purse?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 April 2022
Rhoda Grant
Thank you. I will try and be as quick as I can.
At the start of the process, the NHS Scotland resource allocation committee—NRAC—settlement was not paid in full to NHS Highland. Is that the case now? In relation to the challenges coming down the road, obviously, there is Covid recovery, but there is also the taking on of maternity services on behalf of Grampian for Moray until Dr Gray’s hospital is restored. You also talked about the elective centre. How will you cope with those challenges, and are you receiving the funding that you require in order to deliver for the people of the Highlands?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 April 2022
Rhoda Grant
No. Thank you for letting me attend the meeting, convener.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 April 2022
Rhoda Grant
Obviously, there is no paper trail but, when you were doing your investigation, Auditor General, did you ask the accountable officer who, at ministerial level, told them to proceed?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 28 April 2022
Rhoda Grant
You have not directly asked the accountable officer whether they recall who made that decision.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Rhoda Grant
Thank you.
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Rhoda Grant
That, and the level at which such decisions are taken. At what level would you expect a decision of such magnitude to be taken?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Rhoda Grant
So, there is no documentation on ministers’ decisions and how they were carried out.
I understand that this particular decision was taken within a day. Is that normal? How would you expect a decision of such magnitude to be taken within Government?
Public Audit Committee
Meeting date: 21 April 2022
Rhoda Grant
Thank you, convener—I appreciate that. I know that others have a lot more questions, so I will keep my questions quite short.
I am just seeking some clarification. Having listened to the discussion, I think that it is clear that communication between CMAL and Transport Scotland was documented. It was Transport Scotland that came back to CMAL with ministerial decisions, but is there any paperwork on Transport Scotland’s discussions with ministers to show how it put these things to ministers and which ministers responded?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 20 April 2022
Rhoda Grant
I just have a very quick comment.
I am reasonably disappointed by the Scottish Government’s response, in that it just goes over what it has said before. There is not an awful lot that is different in it.
I note that the National Services Division has not yet responded although, at the time of the previous meeting, it said that it was working with NHS Tayside and was due to meet it at the end of January. It also said that it might be able to consider a formal application in either May or June. It is important to keep the petition open until summer, so that we can see what conclusion the National Services Division reaches.
Mary Ramsay has pointed out that a number of people are affected by the condition, so it is important that we make some progress. Mary has also stated that she would be happy to give further evidence to the committee, if it wishes, and Ian Sharp, who has benefited from focused ultrasound treatment, has also made that offer.
I encourage the committee to keep the petition open and to keep scrutinising the issue in the hope that we make some progress.