Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 18 July 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 622 contributions

|

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Rhoda Grant

Amendment 312 would ensure that land management plans complied

“with the format to be prescribed by the Scottish Ministers”

which would ensure that the plans would meet the terms of the legislation while being simple to produce in a given format. The evidence about the cost of producing land management plans varied widely, so having a pro forma to hand would make those plans simple to pull together. That said, large landholdings will already have plans to manage their land, unless it is derelict, and should be able to quite simply bring those plans together into a given format.

Amendment 315 would extend the review period from five to 10 years, taking into account the fact that land use patterns are slow to change and that tree planting, peatland restoration and the like can all take decades. The amendment would allow additional time before a review must be carried out. Where there is significant change during that period, the bill already allows a framework for changes to be made to land management plans. I think that 10 years strikes a reasonable balance and believe that the 20-year period that would be created by Tim Eagle’s amendment would be far too long.

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]

Land Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 3 June 2025

Rhoda Grant

I believe that land managers would do that—for instance, if you are planting trees, you need to know how many you have planted and you need to manage them to make sure that they are growing properly and that the conditions are right for them. If something goes wrong, you have to take stock and go back. It is the same for peatland restoration, and it is the same for growing food—you need to plan ahead to make sure that the soil is in the right state to grow the crops that you are looking for. Land management is not something that you do and then walk away from; you have to continually monitor what you are doing.

My amendment 335 is reasonably self-explanatory. There is a conflict because the Scottish ministers would be very unlikely to impose obligations on themselves, so the amendment would strengthen land management plans for Scottish Government-owned crofting estates. The Scottish ministers would be able to appoint someone in their stead to fulfil their obligations, especially where there is a conflict.

My amendment 340 would allow the commissioner to decide whether one land management plan is required for multiple holdings or whether each holding should have an individual plan. Although it is likely that an owner would have one plan, there are maybe situations in which the landholdings are very different, and different plans are in place. Amendment 340 works with Mercedes Villalba’s amendments where non-contiguous holdings have a cumulative effect.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

I want to ask about regional marine planning. How will the cumulative impacts of developments across marine planning boundaries be dealt with? If we are talking about the area between Cape Wrath and the Mull of Kintyre, for instance, there will be three councils involved.

09:45  

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

The bill provides for a new overarching power that would allow the Scottish ministers to modify, by regulations, Scottish environmental impact assessment legislation and the habitats regulations. Is that power required, given the existing delegated powers in this area?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

We have heard evidence to suggest that substantial changes should be made by primary legislation. Can you give us an example of what you think the power would be used for? We have had evidence that they are not needed because there is a huge amount of leeway within the existing regulations to allow us to protect other species, for example. There is a fear that having that power might mean that big changes could be made without proper scrutiny.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

How do you get over that at the moment, or do you not? Is that the issue?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

Okay. Does any of the panel have a different view?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

I still have some concerns. I guess that it is our job to ensure that there are checks and balances within Government, but the real concern is that this is just a really wide power. After all, we are making legislation not for this Government but for Governments over the next 20 or 30 years, and the power could be used to cause damage rather than to improve and protect.

11:30  

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

In your written evidence on part 2 of the bill, you say that you responded to the Scottish Government’s consultation on the proposal for new enabling powers, stating that their

“scope ... should be defined objectively, framed as narrowly as possible and any powers to make (or amend) secondary legislation restricted by effective legal boundaries.”

Has the bill, as drafted, delivered that? If not, what are the environmental implications of how the power is currently framed?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 28 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

Thank you.