The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 622 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Amendment 312 would ensure that land management plans complied
“with the format to be prescribed by the Scottish Ministers”
which would ensure that the plans would meet the terms of the legislation while being simple to produce in a given format. The evidence about the cost of producing land management plans varied widely, so having a pro forma to hand would make those plans simple to pull together. That said, large landholdings will already have plans to manage their land, unless it is derelict, and should be able to quite simply bring those plans together into a given format.
Amendment 315 would extend the review period from five to 10 years, taking into account the fact that land use patterns are slow to change and that tree planting, peatland restoration and the like can all take decades. The amendment would allow additional time before a review must be carried out. Where there is significant change during that period, the bill already allows a framework for changes to be made to land management plans. I think that 10 years strikes a reasonable balance and believe that the 20-year period that would be created by Tim Eagle’s amendment would be far too long.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
I believe that land managers would do that—for instance, if you are planting trees, you need to know how many you have planted and you need to manage them to make sure that they are growing properly and that the conditions are right for them. If something goes wrong, you have to take stock and go back. It is the same for peatland restoration, and it is the same for growing food—you need to plan ahead to make sure that the soil is in the right state to grow the crops that you are looking for. Land management is not something that you do and then walk away from; you have to continually monitor what you are doing.
My amendment 335 is reasonably self-explanatory. There is a conflict because the Scottish ministers would be very unlikely to impose obligations on themselves, so the amendment would strengthen land management plans for Scottish Government-owned crofting estates. The Scottish ministers would be able to appoint someone in their stead to fulfil their obligations, especially where there is a conflict.
My amendment 340 would allow the commissioner to decide whether one land management plan is required for multiple holdings or whether each holding should have an individual plan. Although it is likely that an owner would have one plan, there are maybe situations in which the landholdings are very different, and different plans are in place. Amendment 340 works with Mercedes Villalba’s amendments where non-contiguous holdings have a cumulative effect.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
I want to ask about regional marine planning. How will the cumulative impacts of developments across marine planning boundaries be dealt with? If we are talking about the area between Cape Wrath and the Mull of Kintyre, for instance, there will be three councils involved.
09:45Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
The bill provides for a new overarching power that would allow the Scottish ministers to modify, by regulations, Scottish environmental impact assessment legislation and the habitats regulations. Is that power required, given the existing delegated powers in this area?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
We have heard evidence to suggest that substantial changes should be made by primary legislation. Can you give us an example of what you think the power would be used for? We have had evidence that they are not needed because there is a huge amount of leeway within the existing regulations to allow us to protect other species, for example. There is a fear that having that power might mean that big changes could be made without proper scrutiny.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
How do you get over that at the moment, or do you not? Is that the issue?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay. Does any of the panel have a different view?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
I still have some concerns. I guess that it is our job to ensure that there are checks and balances within Government, but the real concern is that this is just a really wide power. After all, we are making legislation not for this Government but for Governments over the next 20 or 30 years, and the power could be used to cause damage rather than to improve and protect.
11:30Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
In your written evidence on part 2 of the bill, you say that you responded to the Scottish Government’s consultation on the proposal for new enabling powers, stating that their
“scope ... should be defined objectively, framed as narrowly as possible and any powers to make (or amend) secondary legislation restricted by effective legal boundaries.”
Has the bill, as drafted, delivered that? If not, what are the environmental implications of how the power is currently framed?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
Thank you.