The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 761 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
About the site, the employees and the business.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
We have heard that there is little or no racing happening at Thornton at the moment, but has the Scottish Government had any dealings with Thornton representatives about whether there is a need for transitional arrangements, given that a business would be closed down as part of this? Staff might be employed there. What transitional arrangements can the Scottish Government put in place?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
You are saying that your amendments would allow “assistance dog” to be defined in the bill and the provisions to be expanded to working dogs or other dogs that are used for different purposes. The definition will be much wider if the Government decides to do that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
The Land Court and the Lands Tribunal have different expertise in a lot of areas. The concern is not about the here and now, but about the future. Is there likely to be a loss of that expertise? Would people taking on a broader range of cases mean that they would have wider knowledge rather than in-depth knowledge about certain issues?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
I am wondering whether you have had discussions with Thornton about transitional arrangements, given—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
It would be useful if, when you do that, you could drop us a line to let us know the outcome of those discussions.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
There are no examples of the requirement to notify the EHRC in other legislation. Is there a possibility that that approach could become more common in future in other areas? If so, what impact would that have?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
My amendments say that there should be a palliative care plan. They do not insist that the person take up that palliative care; they are simply about having a plan for palliative care. Discussing palliative care is totally different. A lot of my constituents have discussions about palliative care. Often, they are told, “What you want to happen won’t happen, because we don’t have the ability to do that.” However, having a plan in place is a guarantee to somebody that what they want will happen. Putting a plan in place gives them a choice, rather than their simply having a discussion and being told, “It’s unlikely to happen for you”.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
I will speak to my amendments 25, 30 and 31. Amendment 25 would ensure that, in order to be eligible for assisted dying, a person must first
“have an anticipatory care plan ... which includes ... palliative care”.
Amendments 30 and 31 are consequential. Amendment 30 would include a statement to that effect in the assessment statement, and amendment 31 would include a statement to that effect in the second declaration.
It is important to put on record that I do not support the bill, and I have concerns that, should it become law, people will opt for assisted dying due to a fear of having little support at the end of their lives. Amendment 25 would ensure that they have in place an anticipatory care plan that includes a palliative care plan. That would empower people who are coming towards the end of their lives to plan ahead and to ensure that they have control over the care that they will receive at the end of their lives. If they choose to go ahead with assisted dying, they will, at the very least, have had all the options explained to them and laid out in detail.
I also believe that these amendments would ensure that those who fear the future and what may lie ahead will have information about that and will have input into the care that they receive. That would mean that every decision is informed, and no one should feel pressure to access assisted dying for fear of how they may die without the full knowledge of an anticipatory care plan.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 November 2025
Rhoda Grant
I see my amendments as providing better protection. I have personal knowledge from looking at end-of-life care for relatives and from representing constituents who are in that position. I know that it is incredibly difficult to get a proper palliative care plan in place. I have had constituents who simply cannot get one, despite crying out for it and wanting it in place. I also know, from personal experience, that getting such a plan to hang together is very difficult. That, at the end of life, would cause fear to people about what lies ahead of them. At least if a plan is laid out and they know that that is what they are going to get towards the end of their life, they can make an informed decision about what they want to do. At the moment, a right to palliative care does not exist. My amendments would at least provide such a plan for people towards the end of life.