The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 698 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
I would like to ask a couple of questions, because things have occurred to me as I have been listening to people’s answers.
Given what people are saying about the current situation, could the bill make improvements through the guidance on its implementation that will accompany it? Would that help address the issue with schools taking different approaches? I direct that question to Leah Rivka first.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
I have a question for those who are from faith schools. It was mentioned that the belief of the faith school runs through the whole curriculum, not just through RO and RME. How will the bill impact on that? Will it create an issue? Perhaps Barbara Coupar could answer that.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
The bill’s objective is to comply with the UNCRC as well as to give coherence and clarity to the process of withdrawing from RO and RME, but we have been hearing concerns about whether it achieves those objectives. Is there anything that we can do to amend the bill to ensure that it does? I am conscious of the time, so perhaps it should be something that you have not already mentioned.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
Do you think that religious and moral education should come out of the scope of the bill? Is it so different that it should not be in the bill at all?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
Stephen?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay. What about the other Stephen?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
Barbara?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
I will ask you a difficult question. Given that this committee cannot rewrite the whole bill, is there a quick fix that we can recommend to the Scottish Government? We have to report to it and say, “This is what we think you should do with the bill.” We cannot just take it away and rewrite it. Are you saying that the bill just will not work and that there is a need to go back and rewrite it? Is that the fix, or is there something simpler that we can do?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
We are coming to the end of a parliamentary session, so I do not think that anything other than a quick fix is an option at this moment.
When we come into a new parliamentary session, of course, a new Government will have its own priorities, so the bill is probably an opportunity to do something. Certainly, there will be no other opportunity for at least a couple of years, and maybe beyond that, because it takes a year before new Government legislation starts to come through. If the Government has other priorities, that timetable slips back further. Realistically, we would be looking at four years. I am not making that up. Such a bill could be a priority for a new Government, but that is unlikely, because it is technical. Should we try to make the best of the bill, rather than saying that we do not agree with its general principles?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
The bill’s objective is to comply with the UNCRC, as well as to provide coherence and clarity with regard to the process of withdrawal from RO and RME. You have concerns about the bill. What are your thoughts on how we could ensure that the bill achieves those aims?