Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 6 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 761 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Greyhound Racing (Offences) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Rhoda Grant

About the site, the employees and the business.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Greyhound Racing (Offences) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Rhoda Grant

We have heard that there is little or no racing happening at Thornton at the moment, but has the Scottish Government had any dealings with Thornton representatives about whether there is a need for transitional arrangements, given that a business would be closed down as part of this? Staff might be employed there. What transitional arrangements can the Scottish Government put in place?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Dog Theft (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Rhoda Grant

You are saying that your amendments would allow “assistance dog” to be defined in the bill and the provisions to be expanded to working dogs or other dogs that are used for different purposes. The definition will be much wider if the Government decides to do that.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Rhoda Grant

The Land Court and the Lands Tribunal have different expertise in a lot of areas. The concern is not about the here and now, but about the future. Is there likely to be a loss of that expertise? Would people taking on a broader range of cases mean that they would have wider knowledge rather than in-depth knowledge about certain issues?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Greyhound Racing (Offences) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Rhoda Grant

I am wondering whether you have had discussions with Thornton about transitional arrangements, given—

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Greyhound Racing (Offences) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 5 November 2025

Rhoda Grant

It would be useful if, when you do that, you could drop us a line to let us know the outcome of those discussions.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Rhoda Grant

There are no examples of the requirement to notify the EHRC in other legislation. Is there a possibility that that approach could become more common in future in other areas? If so, what impact would that have?

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Rhoda Grant

My amendments say that there should be a palliative care plan. They do not insist that the person take up that palliative care; they are simply about having a plan for palliative care. Discussing palliative care is totally different. A lot of my constituents have discussions about palliative care. Often, they are told, “What you want to happen won’t happen, because we don’t have the ability to do that.” However, having a plan in place is a guarantee to somebody that what they want will happen. Putting a plan in place gives them a choice, rather than their simply having a discussion and being told, “It’s unlikely to happen for you”.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Rhoda Grant

I will speak to my amendments 25, 30 and 31. Amendment 25 would ensure that, in order to be eligible for assisted dying, a person must first

“have an anticipatory care plan ... which includes ... palliative care”.

Amendments 30 and 31 are consequential. Amendment 30 would include a statement to that effect in the assessment statement, and amendment 31 would include a statement to that effect in the second declaration.

It is important to put on record that I do not support the bill, and I have concerns that, should it become law, people will opt for assisted dying due to a fear of having little support at the end of their lives. Amendment 25 would ensure that they have in place an anticipatory care plan that includes a palliative care plan. That would empower people who are coming towards the end of their lives to plan ahead and to ensure that they have control over the care that they will receive at the end of their lives. If they choose to go ahead with assisted dying, they will, at the very least, have had all the options explained to them and laid out in detail.

I also believe that these amendments would ensure that those who fear the future and what may lie ahead will have information about that and will have input into the care that they receive. That would mean that every decision is informed, and no one should feel pressure to access assisted dying for fear of how they may die without the full knowledge of an anticipatory care plan.

Health, Social Care and Sport Committee [Draft]

Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2

Meeting date: 4 November 2025

Rhoda Grant

I see my amendments as providing better protection. I have personal knowledge from looking at end-of-life care for relatives and from representing constituents who are in that position. I know that it is incredibly difficult to get a proper palliative care plan in place. I have had constituents who simply cannot get one, despite crying out for it and wanting it in place. I also know, from personal experience, that getting such a plan to hang together is very difficult. That, at the end of life, would cause fear to people about what lies ahead of them. At least if a plan is laid out and they know that that is what they are going to get towards the end of their life, they can make an informed decision about what they want to do. At the moment, a right to palliative care does not exist. My amendments would at least provide such a plan for people towards the end of life.