Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 2 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1839 contributions

|

Meeting of the Parliament

Portfolio Question Time

Meeting date: 20 December 2023

Pauline McNeill

—so that they get the same efficient service from their GPs?

Meeting of the Parliament

Topical Question Time

Meeting date: 19 December 2023

Pauline McNeill

To close 29 stations is unprecedented and will impact on communities across Scotland at a time when confidence in the police is falling. Stations such as Leith, in Edinburgh, and Stewart Street, in Glasgow, have high usage. The Stewart Street station, in Glasgow city centre, is open 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and it is difficult to see how the city centre of Glasgow could be adequately policed without that station. Does the cabinet secretary agree that the source of the issue is a poor capital budget settlement for Police Scotland? Specifically, what representations has the cabinet secretary made to prevent what is a mass closure of police stations?

Meeting of the Parliament

General Question Time

Meeting date: 14 December 2023

Pauline McNeill

To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on whether the current options available to record the relationship status of a deceased person are sufficient for the purposes of this information being accurately represented on death certificates. (S6O-02888)

Meeting of the Parliament

First Minister’s Question Time

Meeting date: 14 December 2023

Pauline McNeill

This week, it has been reported that Police Scotland faces a surge in mental health calls—they account for one in six calls, to be exact. I am sure that the Deputy First Minister will agree that the police do an amazing job and often deal with people who are at their lowest point.

However, many officers feel that they are filling a gap in health and social care. I have even heard that, last week, officers changed shifts because they had waited so long in an accident and emergency department. His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland’s report states that there are better ways of getting people to the service than police officers staying for long periods of time. What action is the Scottish Government taking to address police officers’ time? Does the Deputy First Minister agree that the situation simply cannot continue?

Meeting of the Parliament

General Question Time

Meeting date: 14 December 2023

Pauline McNeill

I apologise to the cabinet secretary for the complexity of this supplementary, but I ask her to bear with me. Only the wife, husband or relative of a recently deceased person has the legal right to register their death. Partners who are cohabitants, regardless of for how many years, do not have that right. They must either own property with the loved one who has died or be present at their death. Cohabiting partners are also not allowed to be recognised on the death certificate.

However, apparently some registry offices can record the deceased as being survived by their former partner whom they divorced many years ago. That is the key point. Does the Scottish Government consider that to be right in such cases or, in fact, accurate, if they have been long divorced? Could that happen where there has been an abusive spouse? I just raise that question. If the deceased’s status was divorced and they have a surviving partner, perhaps there is no need to record the former relationship. I wonder whether the Scottish Government could raise awareness—

Meeting of the Parliament

General Question Time

Meeting date: 14 December 2023

Pauline McNeill

—among cohabiting partners and awareness that registrars should be sensitive to such cases.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 December 2023

Pauline McNeill

Do you think that it would be a good use of the Parliament’s time to take through the necessary legislation to allow for research such as that done by Cheryl Thomas?

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 December 2023

Pauline McNeill

My final question is about the numbers on the jury if the not proven verdict were to be removed. The profession would prefer a unanimous jury but would accept, as in England, a majority of 10 to two. I understand that your fundamental position is to retain the not proven verdict. Ronnie Renucci, can you talk the committee through what, you think, the Crown would have to show in order to get a conviction? To a layperson, you are saying that the jury is required to have a unanimous verdict before you could convict, and that sounds like it would be really difficult to get a conviction, whereas a majority of 10 to two seems to allow for it. However, of course, we do not understand how juries operate or the proceedings of a court.

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 December 2023

Pauline McNeill

That is helpful. Finally, given the hundreds of cases that you have—

Criminal Justice Committee

Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 13 December 2023

Pauline McNeill

I understand most of it, but I just want to clarify that, as the proposals stand—not for the other suggestion—it is still the Crown’s position that there should be the option of a retrial under the Government’s proposal for a majority of eight to four. Would you still argue for that?

12:00