The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1398 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
So, it is right to say that you do not oppose criminalisation in some form?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
I do not know whether Jeff Gibbons could answer this, but has the Government done any background work on the factors that drive women into prostitution or the sex trade? We have heard offline from some women who are involved, but we do not have a full picture of what drives women into the trade. There are various factors, but I wonder whether the Government can share any data on that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
Thank you—that is helpful. You are right. There is a table that has three capacity figures—design, target and extended—but you have done away with that system, and you now have the design capacity and the assessed capacity tolerance.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
It could be done in a different way, potentially.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
That is helpful.
Finally, I have a question about a different subject—the Scottish court custody and prisoner escort service. I understand that you are retendering for the contract and that GEOAmey does not intend to bid for the new contract. Will you provide an update on that process and whether there are any implications for the budget?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
So there is existing legislation that could be used better.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
I will not go into the detail of the options for change at the moment—you have put that on hold anyway—but I will talk about your budget asks. If you get what you want, will it give you more money to look at the list of fire stations that you are considering closing?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
I want to ask you about the programme of decontamination. You have said quite a lot about the state of your estate. There is quite a bit of interest among MSPs about the rolling programme for decontamination facilities. What can you say about the progress that could be made on that if you got your capital ask?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
Thank you. Malcolm Graham, on the same subject. what impact are delays in the High Court likely to have? We are not meeting the waiting times at the moment—in fact, post-Covid, I think that the waiting times have gone up, which is disappointing from everyone’s point of view. However, when the time limits from the 1995 act kick in at the end of November, what impact will that have? Are the waiting times likely to go up again?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 November 2025
Pauline McNeill
You are asking, so to speak, for that additional funding. If you get it, could you get those times back to where they should be—or closer to what they should be—in relation to the 1995 act?