The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2128 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
I have a question about the effectiveness of rehabilitation programmes, which Professor Gilchrist might be able to answer. I presume that, if we make them mandatory, they will not work for everyone. Is there an extent to which it is important that the person agrees that they want to go on that journey? Can you tell us anything about how effective rehabilitation programmes can be and who they are most effective for?
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
I think that my questions have largely been covered.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Thank you for putting that on the record. That is helpful to know.
Dr Forbes, you told the committee that you were concerned about the offending behaviour of 16 and 17-year-olds. The committee and the Parliament are interested in this whole area, and we had some exchanges at last week’s meeting about what we should focus on from an educational point of view. If we are seeing higher levels of offending behaviour among 16 and 17-year-olds in this area of law, do you have any views, based on your experience, on what we need to do? Should we tackle boys’ attitudes rather than teaching them about domestic abuse?
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 10 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
From what we have just heard, it is clear cut that Professor Alexis Jay’s advice in that letter was consistent with this Parliament supporting the Tory amendment to the Victims, Witnesses, and Justice Reform (Scotland) Bill. That is clear. However, rather than bring clarity last week on the review on grooming gangs, there is further confusion about who is leading the review. Last week, the Government seemed to give the impression that Professor Alexis Jay is leading it, but all press reports say that that is not the case. Can the minister confirm which of the two groups is leading the review? Is it His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland or the strategic group? We need to know who is leading it.
I highlighted in last week’s debate that there was a list of 46 children—including Taylor, who is a victim—and Police Scotland said that there would be an investigation. Given the importance of the issue—I also said this last week—I would like to know whether that list is included in the review on grooming gangs before we get to the question whether we need a full-blown inquiry.
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
To ask the Scottish Government how it is tackling the increase in demand for ADHD assessments in Glasgow. (S6O-05244)
Meeting of the Parliament [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
A 23-year-old constituent of mine was on the ADHD waiting list in January 2023, and was told that she would have a wait of around 18 months. Since then, there has not been much contact with her. Last week, she called to find out when she would be seen, and she was told that she would certainly not be seen before 2027. We are talking about a period of at least three years of her life.
Will the minister help me understand why the waiting time has expanded so much? He can correct me on this, but I think that patients are taken in order—no priority is given and there is no triaging—so I am wondering why it has expanded so much. Is the minister concerned that my constituent is not getting a straight answer and can he assure me that there will at least be transparency so that NHS patients can understand when they will be seen?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
Could self-defence not be argued in court in such cases?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
That is what I thought you said. It is a striking comment. Do the other witnesses share that view about the register?
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
I know, but I just want to understand—
Criminal Justice Committee 3 December 2025 [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 December 2025
Pauline McNeill
This is a central part of the bill, and that comment is very pertinent, so I just wanted to get your reaction to that. As I understand it, the purpose of putting convicted offenders on the list would be so that the police could monitor them. I acknowledge what has been said about resources and everything else, but that would be the purpose of it, so it is quite interesting to hear that there might be an unintended consequence. Tumay, do you want to comment?